Visitor management system comparison

LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management vs MyLobby

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management has published signals around Enterprise-scale integration of access control and video with an established partner ecosystem, Single-tenant OnGuard Cloud hosted on AWS, and Extensive third-party ecosystem (200+ partners) and OAAP certifications. MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

57
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management
51
MyLobby
CriteriaLenelS2 OnGuard Visitor ManagementMyLobby
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.
76
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management76/1004. 5/5 from 67 published reviews across 1 source, with 34 stored feedback themes67 reviews across review sources
69
MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management has the stronger published signal here.
74
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management74/10017 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
21
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management21/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
78
MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
NE
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor ManagementNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
38
MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
63
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management63/10014 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management has the stronger published signal here.
82
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management82/1008 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
37
MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
17
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management17/1001 vendor page analysed, 1 review source captured1 source page analysed
58
MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
53
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management53/10060% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
93
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management93/1003 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor ManagementNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.
68
LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
68
MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management when

  • Enterprise-scale integration of access control and video with an established partner ecosystem.
  • Single-tenant OnGuard Cloud hosted on AWS
  • Extensive third-party ecosystem (200+ partners) and OAAP certifications
  • Unified client (Magic Monitor) combining access, video and forensics
  • Large enterprises and campus environments requiring unified access and video

Choose MyLobby when

  • Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
  • Contractor management

LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management fit considerations

  • Slow performance when used remotely
  • Slow loading for visitor details across extended date ranges
  • Requires date filtering for faster results
  • Limited reporting customization
  • Slow loading of visitor data across extended date ranges

MyLobby fit considerations

  • Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
  • Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
  • Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?
MetricLenelS2 OnGuard Visitor ManagementMyLobby
Customer review sentiment4. 5/5 from 67 published reviews across 1 source, with 34 stored feedback themes4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth17 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations14 published deployment and integration options0 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage8 documented sectors4 documented sectors
Published evidence1 vendor page analysed, 1 review source captured12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured
Visitor management focus60% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations3 access-control integration signalsNo access-control integration evidence captured
Pricing transparencyPricing page publishedPricing page published
Comparison positioningLenelS2 positions OnGuard and companion products as scalable, enterprise-grade access control and unified security platforms with cloud and hybrid deployment flexibility.Compare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.
Best-fit signalsChoose LenelS2 when you need enterprise-scale integration of access control and video with an established partner ecosystem.Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.

LenelS2 OnGuard Visitor Management

buildings.honeywell.com/us/en/brands/our-brands/lenels2

  • Single-tenant OnGuard Cloud hosted on AWS
  • Extent of built-in visitor-management workflows (kiosk, preregistration, contractor induction)
  • medium confidence
View full profile

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

  • Contractor management
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • low confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system