Visitor management system comparison

Entry2Exit vs friendlyway

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Entry2Exit has published signals around A single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support, Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments, and Combined suite covering visitor check-in, parking ANPR and facility/asset management under one platform. friendlyway has published signals around Combined kiosk hardware and software from one vendor for large multi-site rollouts, Good fit for manufacturing, public sector and organisations that require evacuation mustering and robust badge/ID workflows, and Bundled hardware and software product line with dedicated kiosk models and display bundles. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

Entry2Exit

friendlyway

CriteriaEntry2Exitfriendlyway

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.

Entry2Exit79/1005. 0/5 from 10 published reviews across 2 sources, with 24 stored feedback themes10 reviews across review sources

friendlywayNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured

Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.

Entry2Exit81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway69/10016 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway46/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

Entry2ExitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit38/1009 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway58/10013 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway93/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory.

Entry2Exit49/1009 vendor pages analysed, 2 review sources captured9 source pages analysed

friendlyway47/1008 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured8 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.

Entry2Exit93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway60/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

Entry2ExitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlywayNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.

Entry2Exit93/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals

friendlyway93/1007 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose Entry2Exit when

A single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support.
Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments
Combined suite covering visitor check-in, parking ANPR and facility/asset management under one platform
Enterprise sites and multi‑branch operators needing centralised visitor, parking and facility control
Entry2Exit publishes evacuation & safety in evacuation & safety.

Choose friendlyway when

Combined kiosk hardware and software from one vendor for large multi-site rollouts.
Good fit for manufacturing, public sector and organisations that require evacuation mustering and robust badge/ID workflows.
Bundled hardware and software product line with dedicated kiosk models and display bundles.
Published per-display digital-signage pricing and per-device add-on fees for predictable signage budgeting.
Organisations needing integrated kiosks + signage + visitor check-in

Entry2Exit fit considerations

Clarify SLA, support hours and on‑site commissioning responsibilities
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
How should evacuation, roll-call, and on-site occupancy workflows operate across your sites?
Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

friendlyway fit considerations

Mobile platform support (native iOS/Android apps) is not detailed on product pages and may require confirmation if mobile check-in is required.
Total cost of ownership when buying vendor kiosks vs using third-party devices
Depth of access-control and PIAM integrations required for secure sites
Emergency mustering and compliance reporting capabilities for regulated industries
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

Metric	Entry2Exit	friendlyway
Customer review sentiment	5. 0/5 from 10 published reviews across 2 sources, with 24 stored feedback themes	No review score listed
Visitor workflow depth	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth	8 documented capabilities	16 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations	9 published deployment and integration options	13 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	7 documented sectors	13 documented sectors
Published evidence	9 vendor pages analysed, 2 review sources captured	8 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	1 access-control integration signal	2 access-control integration signals
Pricing transparency	1 published pricing plan	7 published pricing plans
Best for	Reception & security teams wanting digital check-in and badge printing, Property managers replacing paper logbooks with auditable digital records, Parking and operations teams needing ANPR, payments and slot booking, Facilities teams seeking integrated asset, ticketing and maintenance workflows, Event or multi‑site operators requiring centralized, branded visitor flows	Front desk automation and reception modernization, Facilities with multi-site rollouts that need central device control, Manufacturing plants requiring PPE and guided-visit workflows, Organizations needing integrated digital signage and wayfinding
Comparison positioning	Entry2Exit positions itself as a UAE‑based, modular facility platform combining visitor management, ANPR parking and asset/maintenance workflows for multi‑site enterprises.	friendlyway positions itself as an integrated vendor of cloud software and German-made kiosk hardware for enterprise visitor management and digital signage.
Best-fit signals	Choose Entry2Exit when you need a single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support.	Choose friendlyway when you need combined kiosk hardware and software from one vendor for large multi-site rollouts., Good fit for manufacturing, public sector and organisations that require evacuation mustering and robust badge/ID workflows.
Pricing information	Website states pricing is flexible and tailored to each organisation; contact sales for a quote.	A 14-day free trial is available.

Entry2Exit

entry2exit.com

Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments
medium confidence

View full profile

friendlyway

www.friendlyway.com

Bundled hardware and software product line with dedicated kiosk models and display bundles.
Total cost of ownership when buying vendor kiosks vs using third-party devices
high confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system