Visitor management system comparison

Entry2Exit vs KeepnTrack

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Entry2Exit has published signals around A single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support, Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments, and Combined suite covering visitor check-in, parking ANPR and facility/asset management under one platform. KeepnTrack has published signals around Combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits), Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management, and Preconfigured custom printers/scanners sold to work with the system. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

Entry2Exit

KeepnTrack

CriteriaEntry2ExitKeepnTrack

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.

Entry2Exit79/1005. 0/5 from 10 published reviews across 2 sources, with 8 stored feedback themes10 reviews across review sources

KeepnTrack73/1004. 0/5 from 40 published reviews across 4 sources, with 23 stored feedback themes40 reviews across review sources

Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.

Entry2Exit81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.

Entry2Exit31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack30/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

Entry2ExitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit38/1009 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit.

Entry2Exit71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. KeepnTrack has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit49/1009 vendor pages analysed, 2 review sources captured9 source pages analysed

KeepnTrack93/10024 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.

Entry2Exit93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.

Entry2Exit26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

Entry2ExitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.

Entry2Exit93/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose Entry2Exit when

A single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support.
Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments
Combined suite covering visitor check-in, parking ANPR and facility/asset management under one platform
Enterprise sites and multi‑branch operators needing centralised visitor, parking and facility control
Entry2Exit publishes evacuation & safety in evacuation & safety.

Choose KeepnTrack when

Combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits).
Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management
Preconfigured custom printers/scanners sold to work with the system
K–12 and higher‑education campuses needing student and visitor management
Organizations running volunteer programs that require hour tracking and applicant workflows

Entry2Exit fit considerations

Clarify SLA, support hours and on‑site commissioning responsibilities
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
How should evacuation, roll-call, and on-site occupancy workflows operate across your sites?
Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

KeepnTrack fit considerations

Assess hardware costs and logistics when using vendor-supplied printers/scanners.
Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
How well does KeepnTrack match your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?

Metric	Entry2Exit	KeepnTrack
Customer review sentiment	5. 0/5 from 10 published reviews across 2 sources, with 8 stored feedback themes	4. 0/5 from 40 published reviews across 4 sources, with 23 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth	8 documented capabilities	8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations	9 published deployment and integration options	2 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	7 documented sectors	7 documented sectors
Published evidence	9 vendor pages analysed, 2 review sources captured	24 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	1 access-control integration signal	No access-control integration evidence captured
Pricing transparency	1 published pricing plan	Pricing page published
Best for	Reception & security teams wanting digital check-in and badge printing, Property managers replacing paper logbooks with auditable digital records, Parking and operations teams needing ANPR, payments and slot booking, Facilities teams seeking integrated asset, ticketing and maintenance workflows, Event or multi‑site operators requiring centralized, branded visitor flows	Front-desk / reception teams managing visitor check-in, School administrators tracking students and guardians, Volunteer program managers tracking onboarding and hours, Organizations needing real-time headcount and emergency alerts, Facilities wanting digitised visitor records and reporting
Comparison positioning	Entry2Exit positions itself as a UAE‑based, modular facility platform combining visitor management, ANPR parking and asset/maintenance workflows for multi‑site enterprises.	KeepnTrack positions itself as a campus- and volunteer-focused visitor management suite with built-in screening, badge printing and volunteer hours tracking, plus optional preconfigured hardware and cloud hosting.
Best-fit signals	Choose Entry2Exit when you need a single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support.	Choose KeepnTrack when you need combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits).

Entry2Exit

entry2exit.com

Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments
medium confidence

View full profile

KeepnTrack

www.keepntrack.com

Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management
medium confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system