Visitor Management Systems

Visitor management system comparison

Entry2Exit vs MyLobby

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Entry2Exit has published signals around A single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support, Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments, and Combined suite covering visitor check-in, parking ANPR and facility/asset management under one platform. MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

58
Entry2Exit
51
MyLobby
CriteriaEntry2ExitMyLobby
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.
79
Entry2Exit79/1005. 0/5 from 10 published reviews across 2 sources, with 24 stored feedback themes10 reviews across review sources
69
MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
Entry2Exit81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
Entry2Exit31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.
90
Entry2Exit90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
78
MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
NE
Entry2ExitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
38
MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
38
Entry2Exit38/1009 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.
71
Entry2Exit71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
37
MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
49
Entry2Exit49/1009 vendor pages analysed, 2 review sources captured9 source pages analysed
58
MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.
93
Entry2Exit93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
26
Entry2Exit26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
Entry2ExitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. Entry2Exit has the stronger published signal here.
93
Entry2Exit93/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals
68
MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose Entry2Exit when

  • A single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support.
  • Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments
  • Combined suite covering visitor check-in, parking ANPR and facility/asset management under one platform
  • Enterprise sites and multi‑branch operators needing centralised visitor, parking and facility control
  • Entry2Exit publishes evacuation & safety in evacuation & safety.

Choose MyLobby when

  • Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
  • Contractor management

Entry2Exit fit considerations

  • Clarify SLA, support hours and on‑site commissioning responsibilities
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
  • How should evacuation, roll-call, and on-site occupancy workflows operate across your sites?
  • Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

MyLobby fit considerations

  • Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
  • Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
  • Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?
MetricEntry2ExitMyLobby
Customer review sentiment5. 0/5 from 10 published reviews across 2 sources, with 24 stored feedback themes4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityiOS and Android; Optional kioskiOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Deployment and integrations9 published deployment and integration options0 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage7 documented sectors4 documented sectors
Published evidence9 vendor pages analysed, 2 review sources captured12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations1 access-control integration signalNo access-control integration evidence captured
Pricing transparency1 published pricing planPricing page published
Comparison positioningEntry2Exit positions itself as a UAE‑based, modular facility platform combining visitor management, ANPR parking and asset/maintenance workflows for multi‑site enterprises.Compare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.
Best-fit signalsChoose Entry2Exit when you need a single vendor to cover visitor, parking and facility workflows with local GCC deployments and on‑site support.Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
Pricing informationWebsite states pricing is flexible and tailored to each organisation; contact sales for a quote.Pricing includes se Study Contact Us Support New Features MyLobby Visitor Management Pricing Packages Lite $45 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial QR...; een with the company logo Email Notification Ability to send notification via email Basic $85 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; compliance in the facility while also substantially speeding up your workflows. Standard $179 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; lete the submission. This is a great way to ensure every entry is compliant. Professional $249 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Ma...

Entry2Exit

entry2exit.com

  • Regional case studies (hotels, residences, agribusiness) showing on‑premise and managed deployments
  • medium confidence
View full profile

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

  • Contractor management
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • low confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system