Visitor management system comparison

Envoy vs Teamgo

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Envoy and Teamgo are both cloud visitor management systems with overlapping capabilities (kiosk check-in, pre-registration, badge printing, evacuation reports). Key pairwise differences affect buyer fit around deployment/hosting, pricing posture, mobile support, contractor workflows, evacuation features, access-control integrations, and hardware/offline behavior.

Last checked: 1 Sept 2026
Sources: 48
Evidence confidence: High

Pair analysis confidence: medium

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

Envoy

Teamgo

CriteriaEnvoyTeamgo

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. Envoy has the stronger published signal here.

100

Envoy100/1004. 6/5 from 1365 published reviews across 8 sources, with 241 stored feedback themes1,365 reviews across review sources

Teamgo89/1004. 4/5 from 83 published reviews across 4 sources, with 133 stored feedback themes83 reviews across review sources

Visitor and contractor workflowsVisitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflows.

Envoy83/1005 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Teamgo83/1005 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Evacuation managementEvacuation, emergency, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, and who-is-on-site workflows. Envoy has the stronger published signal here.

100

Envoy100/1003 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Teamgo67/1002 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Advanced reportingReporting, analytics, dashboards, audit logs, exports, visitor history, and compliance reporting. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.

Envoy67/1002 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Teamgo100/1003 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. Envoy has the stronger published signal here.

Envoy76/10016 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Teamgo57/10012 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.

Envoy53/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Teamgo97/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability. Envoy has the stronger published signal here.

100

Envoy100/100Published ongoing free planPublished vendor and profile signals

Teamgo45/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. Envoy has the stronger published signal here.

Envoy80/10016 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Teamgo40/1008 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit.

100

Envoy100/10014 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Teamgo100/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory.

100

Envoy100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 8 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

100

Teamgo100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.

100

Envoy100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Teamgo100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.

Envoy67/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

TeamgoNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

EnvoyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Teamgo100/100AustraliaPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.

100

Envoy100/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Teamgo100/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Key differences

Factor	Envoy	Teamgo	Buyer meaning
Deployment & data residency	Envoy does not publish explicit regional hosting locations on supplied pages and emphasizes a modular, platform deployment model.	Teamgo publishes AWS hosting with selectable regional options (Australia, UK, US) and states AWS as its cloud provider.	If strict data residency or specified cloud-region hosting is required, Teamgo provides clearer, published regional hosting signals while Envoy will require discussion to confirm residency and region-specific SLAs.
Pricing posture & transparency	Envoy shows some public pricing (Screens $12/device/month and a free Basic tier for tenants) but most Visitor/Workplace product pricing is sales-led or not published on supplied pages.	Teamgo publishes fixed monthly plans (Essential $29, Advance $99, Complete $199) and a 30‑day free trial, plus enterprise quoting.	Organizations needing predictable list pricing and quick cost-estimates will find Teamgo’s public tiered pricing simpler to budget for; Envoy buyers should plan for sales engagement and potential per-location/device/feature charges.
Mobile platform & app support	Envoy lists mobile workplace tools and integrations but public pages do not publish explicit mobile OS support details for kiosk/mobile apps.	Teamgo explicitly supports iOS and Android kiosk apps and the Teamgo Pass smartphone app for iPhone and Android.	If you require native mobile kiosk apps or smartphone pass support across iOS and Android out of the box, Teamgo states that capability clearly; confirm Envoy’s supported mobile platforms for kiosk use if that matters.
Contractor management & compliance workflows	Envoy advertises contractor workflow support (pre-registration, screening, document collection) as part of broader workplace tooling; public detail level and whether features are included per tier is not fully published.	Teamgo publishes contractor compliance features including document requests, inductions, expiry monitoring, and attendance tracking as core product signals.	Sites with heavy contractor/induction compliance needs may see clearer out-of-the-box signals in Teamgo’s feature set; Envoy could still meet requirements but buyers should confirm which contractor features are included at which license level.
Evacuation & emergency mustering	Envoy states emergency response features with real-time presence data and emergency notifications to confirm safety.	Teamgo states emergency activation, evacuation reporting and on-site attendee lists for roll-call during emergencies.	Both systems support evacuation/mustering; buyers should validate desired specifics (SMS/voice alerting, offline muster, drill reporting frequency) since both present slightly different emphases in marketing language.
Access-control integrations	Envoy lists integrations with established access-control vendors (examples include LenelS2, Brivo) and positions itself as integrable with access control systems as part of the platform.	Teamgo mentions integrations such as Azure/Active Directory and badge-printer support; explicit third‑party access-control vendor integrations are less prominent on public pages.	If you need direct, proven integrations with specific access-control platforms, Envoy surfaces integration partners and should be probed for connector maturity; Teamgo may integrate via directory/automation but require validation for specific physical access v
Hardware & offline kiosk behavior	Envoy indicates iPads for visitor check-in and optional kiosk hardware; public pages do not detail offline sync behavior or multi-platform kiosk app support.	Teamgo explicitly supports iPad and Android kiosks, states offline kiosk sync behavior and mentions broad kiosk and mobile device support.	For environments with intermittent connectivity or mixed tablet fleets, Teamgo’s published offline sync and Android/iPad kiosk describes reduce uncertainty; Envoy buyers should ask about offline modes and supported kiosk devices.
Pricing model orientation	Envoy’s approach is modular enterprise/platform with some free/tenant-focused options and device-based Screens pricing; other product pricing is sales-led.	Teamgo takes a fixed-tier SaaS pricing approach with list monthly rates for business tiers and clear trial terms.	Smaller organizations wanting a clear self-serve purchase path may prefer Teamgo’s published tiers; larger enterprises seeking a bundled platform across workplace services may accept Envoy’s sales-led, modular pricing but should budget time for quotation and t

Choose Envoy when

A broad workplace platform that combines visitors with desk/room booking, digital signage and emergency response and you expect enterprise-scale integrations and multi-tenant property workflows.
You prioritise vendors with larger market presence and extensive published integration partner lists (access control vendors).
You plan to negotiate bespoke per-location/licensing terms as part of an enterprise procurement.
Visitor management must connect to security, compliance, access, and workplace operations.
Properties need tenant participation alongside centralized lobby administration.

Choose Teamgo when

Explicit, published list pricing for faster budget decisions and a clear self-serve purchasing path for small-to-mid teams.
Explicit regional AWS hosting options and native Android + iPad kiosk apps plus a smartphone pass app for QR/contactless workflows.
Built-in contractor induction, document expiry monitoring, geofencing attendance, or guaranteed offline kiosk sync out of the box.
One platform must cover visitors, employees and contractors.
Multiple check-in modes are useful across offices, sites or mobile teams.

Envoy fit considerations

A lightweight reception-only requirement may not need the broader security and workplace platform scope.
Rollouts involving multiple locations, devices, access systems, and tenant structures require coordinated configuration.
Its strongest value is in structured, security-conscious workplace operations rather than a minimal sign-in-only deployment.
The visitor-management buying path emphasizes demos and sales contact for broader deployments.
Operational rollout may involve coordinating kiosk or iPad check-in, badge printing, identity checks, documents, and access integrations.

Teamgo fit considerations

The product spans many modules, so plan selection and workflow design should be part of the evaluation.
Kiosk-led deployments may require operational decisions about BYO devices, mounting and printers:
Geofencing introduces mobile-app and location-permission dependencies:
The broad feature set may require careful tier and add-on selection for teams seeking a narrowly scoped reception workflow.
Kiosk deployments involve device, mounting and printer decisions even though the software supports BYO devices

What appears similar

Both vendors present audit/exportable visitor records and notifications to hosts on visitor arrival.
Both advertise emergency/evacuation tools; differences are in published emphasis rather than a clear capability absence.

Fit questions

Which system better matches your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?
Which platform fits your current workplace, identity, messaging, and access-control stack?
Which rollout path is easiest for your locations, support model, and budget?

Metric	Envoy	Teamgo
Customer review sentiment	4. 6/5 from 1365 published reviews across 8 sources, with 241 stored feedback themes	4. 4/5 from 83 published reviews across 4 sources, with 133 stored feedback themes
Visitor and contractor workflows	5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals	5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals
Evacuation management	3 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals	2 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals
Advanced reporting	2 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals	3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals
Published feature breadth	16 documented capabilities	12 documented capabilities
Ongoing free access	Published ongoing free plan	Free trial published
Deployment and integrations	16 published deployment and integration options	8 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	14 documented sectors	13 documented sectors
Published evidence	24 vendor pages analysed, 8 review sources captured	24 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	2 access-control integration signals	No access-control integration evidence captured
Pricing transparency	1 published pricing plan	4 published pricing plans
Best for	Security and facilities teams managing visitor check-in across one or many locations, Regulated workplaces requiring audit-ready visitor records and digital documentation, Multi-tenant property owners coordinating visitors across tenants and suites, Workplace teams replacing paper sign-in with customizable digital workflows, Organizations needing identity screening, host notifications, and temporary access, Front desks using iPad or kiosk-based visitor registration, Enterprises integrating visitor data with access control and workplace tools	Workplaces replacing paper sign-in with automated visitor, employee and contractor check-in, Organisations needing configurable visitor inductions, document collection and compliance records, Multi-site teams using iPad, Android, QR-code or mobile check-in, Construction, logistics and field-work organisations needing contractor or geofenced attendance visibility, Schools, charities and not-for-profits seeking self-service check-in and emergency communications, Security-conscious workplaces requiring screening, watch lists, deny lists and capacity alerts
Comparison positioning	Envoy stands out as a workplace-security platform that combines visitor management with compliance, access, emergency visibility, and broader workplace operations.	Teamgo compares as a broad, workflow-oriented visitor platform combining visitor, employee, contractor, kiosk, QR-code and geofencing use cases with published tier pricing.
Best-fit signals	Choose Envoy when visitor management must connect to security, compliance, access, and workplace operations., Choose Envoy when properties need tenant participation alongside centralized lobby administration., Choose Envoy when the organization needs configurable visitor types, documents, screening, and reporting.	Choose Teamgo when one platform must cover visitors, employees and contractors., Choose it when multiple check-in modes are useful across offices, sites or mobile teams., Choose it when configurable compliance workflows and exportable reporting matter.
Fit considerations	A lightweight reception-only requirement may not need the broader security and workplace platform scope., Rollouts involving multiple locations, devices, access systems, and tenant structures require coordinated configuration.	The product spans many modules, so plan selection and workflow design should be part of the evaluation., Kiosk-led deployments may require operational decisions about BYO devices, mounting and printers:, Geofencing introduces mobile-app and location-permission dependencies:

SourcesVisitor workflows Platform integrations Multi-tenant operations

SourcesFeatures Workflows Overview

Envoy

envoy.com

Identity verification can use IDs, internal blocklists, and third-party watchlists.
Depth of identity screening and compliance documentation
high confidence

View full profile

Teamgo

www.teamgo.co

Custom inductions, forms, document requests and QR-code issuance are built into the workflow model:
Depth of contractor induction and document workflows
high confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system