Visitor management system comparison

KeepnTrack vs LobbyBase

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

KeepnTrack has published signals around Combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits), Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management, and Preconfigured custom printers/scanners sold to work with the system. LobbyBase has published signals around A single vendor for visitor check-ins plus space/desk booking and want a quick trial and deployment, Combined visitor management and space booking in one platform (visitor + desk/room booking + analytics), and Free 30-day trial with no credit card required and fast, no-training setup. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

48
KeepnTrack
35
LobbyBase
CriteriaKeepnTrackLobbyBase
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.
73
KeepnTrack73/1004. 0/5 from 40 published reviews across 4 sources, with 23 stored feedback themes40 reviews across review sources
NE
LobbyBaseNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
KeepnTrack81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
LobbyBase81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
KeepnTrack31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
LobbyBase31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. KeepnTrack has the stronger published signal here.
30
KeepnTrack30/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
21
LobbyBase21/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
NE
KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
38
LobbyBase38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. LobbyBase has the stronger published signal here.
3
KeepnTrack3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
13
LobbyBase13/1004 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. LobbyBase has the stronger published signal here.
71
KeepnTrack71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
LobbyBase93/10012 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. KeepnTrack has the stronger published signal here.
93
KeepnTrack93/10024 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured24 source pages analysed
6
LobbyBase6/1001 vendor page analysed, 0 review sources captured1 source page analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.
93
KeepnTrack93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
LobbyBase93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
NE
KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
LobbyBaseNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
63
LobbyBase63/100Regional hosting signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. LobbyBase has the stronger published signal here.
68
KeepnTrack68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
93
LobbyBase93/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose KeepnTrack when

  • Combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits).
  • Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management
  • Preconfigured custom printers/scanners sold to work with the system
  • K–12 and higher‑education campuses needing student and visitor management
  • Organizations running volunteer programs that require hour tracking and applicant workflows

Choose LobbyBase when

  • A single vendor for visitor check-ins plus space/desk booking and want a quick trial and deployment.
  • Combined visitor management and space booking in one platform (visitor + desk/room booking + analytics).
  • Free 30-day trial with no credit card required and fast, no-training setup.
  • Organizations seeking an integrated visitor-and-space solution for offices, campuses or residential lobbies
  • Teams wanting rapid deployment and a trial before purchase

KeepnTrack fit considerations

  • Assess hardware costs and logistics when using vendor-supplied printers/scanners.
  • Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
  • How well does KeepnTrack match your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?

LobbyBase fit considerations

  • 9% uptime.
  • Check mobile platform support and kiosk/hardware options if needed.
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
  • Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
MetricKeepnTrackLobbyBase
Customer review sentiment4. 0/5 from 40 published reviews across 4 sources, with 23 stored feedback themesNo review score listed
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations2 published deployment and integration options4 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage7 documented sectors12 documented sectors
Published evidence24 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured1 vendor page analysed, 0 review sources captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrationsNo access-control integration evidence capturedNo access-control integration evidence captured
Pricing transparencyPricing page published1 published pricing plan
Best forFront-desk / reception teams managing visitor check-in, School administrators tracking students and guardians, Volunteer program managers tracking onboarding and hours, Organizations needing real-time headcount and emergency alerts, Facilities wanting digitised visitor records and reportingReception and front-desk teams looking to modernize check-ins (visitor experience and host notifications), Workplace operations teams seeking desk and meeting-room booking with occupancy insights, Security teams needing document capture and compliance tracking for visitors, Facilities teams managing deliveries, digital logbooks and audit trails, IT/ops buyers who want a cloud solution with API/integration options
Comparison positioningKeepnTrack positions itself as a campus- and volunteer-focused visitor management suite with built-in screening, badge printing and volunteer hours tracking, plus optional preconfigured hardware and cloud hosting.LobbyBase positions itself as an integrated visitor-and-space management solution for workplaces with emphasis on speed of deployment and an analytics-backed approach.
Best-fit signalsChoose KeepnTrack when you need combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits).Choose when you need a single vendor for visitor check-ins plus space/desk booking and want a quick trial and deployment.

KeepnTrack

www.keepntrack.com

  • Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management
  • medium confidence
View full profile

LobbyBase

lobbybase.com

  • Combined visitor management and space booking in one platform (visitor + desk/room booking + analytics).
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system