Visitor management system comparison

LobbyBase vs Teamgo

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

LobbyBase has published signals around A single vendor for visitor check-ins plus space/desk booking and want a quick trial and deployment, Combined visitor management and space booking in one platform (visitor + desk/room booking + analytics), and Free 30-day trial with no credit card required and fast, no-training setup. Teamgo has published signals around A multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff, Unlimited kiosks and users per account as stated on product pages, and Geofencing attendance for automatic check-in/out of mobile staff. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Choose LobbyBase when

  • A single vendor for visitor check-ins plus space/desk booking and want a quick trial and deployment.
  • Combined visitor management and space booking in one platform (visitor + desk/room booking + analytics).
  • Free 30-day trial with no credit card required and fast, no-training setup.
  • Organizations seeking an integrated visitor-and-space solution for offices, campuses or residential lobbies
  • Teams wanting rapid deployment and a trial before purchase

Choose Teamgo when

  • A multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff.
  • Unlimited kiosks and users per account as stated on product pages
  • Geofencing attendance for automatic check-in/out of mobile staff
  • FaceID facial recognition option and offline kiosk sync
  • Organisations needing multi-location cloud VMS with kiosk and mobile check-in

LobbyBase fit considerations

  • 9% uptime.
  • Check mobile platform support and kiosk/hardware options if needed.
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
  • Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

Teamgo fit considerations

  • Validate integration depth (SCIM/API) for Azure/AD and calendar systems
  • Test offline kiosk behavior and badge printer compatibility (Brother QL series)
  • How should evacuation, roll-call, and on-site occupancy workflows operate across your sites?
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
  • Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
MetricLobbyBaseTeamgo
Recommended score90/10093/100
Ongoing free accessFree trial publishedFree trial published
Visitor workflow depth0 specialised workflow signals4 specialised workflow signals
Customer review sentimentNo review score listed4. 4/5 from 83 published reviews
Evidence confidencemediummedium
Published evidence1 vendor page analysed24 vendor pages analysed
Best forReception and front-desk teams looking to modernize check-ins (visitor experience and host notifications), Workplace operations teams seeking desk and meeting-room booking with occupancy insights, Security teams needing document capture and compliance tracking for visitors, Facilities teams managing deliveries, digital logbooks and audit trails, IT/ops buyers who want a cloud solution with API/integration optionsOrganisations replacing paper visitor books with digital check-in, Multi-location workplaces needing centralised visitor and employee records, Schools and care facilities managing visitors, staff, health screening and emergencies, Construction and logistics sites managing contractors and attendance, Organisations requiring custom visitor workflows, documents and compliance records, Reception-lite workplaces replacing paper sign-in, Organisations needing contactless/QR check-in, Sites requiring pre-registration and inductions, Multi-site enterprises wanting central dashboard, Teams needing geofenced staff attendance, Front-desk visitor sign-in and reception automation, Teams requiring contractor induction and document collection, Sites needing emergency evacuation roll-call and alerts, Distributed workplaces wanting geofencing attendance for mobile staff
Comparison positioningLobbyBase positions itself as an integrated visitor-and-space management solution for workplaces with emphasis on speed of deployment and an analytics-backed approach.Teamgo positions itself as a cloud-first, kiosk- and mobile-centric visitor management system suitable for small sites to global enterprises with a focus on contactless workflows and geofencing attendance.
Best-fit signalsChoose when you need a single vendor for visitor check-ins plus space/desk booking and want a quick trial and deployment.Choose Teamgo when you need a multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff.
Pricing informationPublic site advertises a free 30-day trial and 'Start Free Trial' with no public list pricing or tiers on the cited overview page.Publicly listed monthly plan prices shown on homepage; enterprise and add-on pricing available via sales.

LobbyBase

lobbybase.com

  • Combined visitor management and space booking in one platform (visitor + desk/room booking + analytics).
  • medium confidence
View full profile

Teamgo

www.teamgo.co

  • Unlimited kiosks and users per account as stated on product pages
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system