Visitor management system comparison

Lobbytrack vs Teamgo

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Side-by-side comparison focused on buyer fit and operational differences between Lobbytrack and Teamgo across deployment, hardware, visitor journey, contractor management, evacuation, access control, pricing posture, reviews, evidence confidence, and buyer questions.

Last checked
1 Sept 2026
Sources
48
Evidence confidence
Medium

Pair analysis confidence: medium

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

86
Lobbytrack
70
Teamgo
CriteriaLobbytrackTeamgo
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. Lobbytrack has the stronger published signal here.
100
Lobbytrack100/1004. 7/5 from 151 published reviews across 7 sources, with 127 stored feedback themes151 reviews across review sources
89
Teamgo89/1004. 4/5 from 83 published reviews across 4 sources, with 133 stored feedback themes83 reviews across review sources
Visitor and contractor workflowsVisitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflows.
83
Lobbytrack83/1005 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
83
Teamgo83/1005 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Evacuation managementEvacuation, emergency, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, and who-is-on-site workflows.
67
Lobbytrack67/1002 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
67
Teamgo67/1002 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Advanced reportingReporting, analytics, dashboards, audit logs, exports, visitor history, and compliance reporting.
100
Lobbytrack100/1003 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
100
Teamgo100/1003 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. Lobbytrack has the stronger published signal here.
100
Lobbytrack100/10032 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
57
Teamgo57/10012 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals.
97
Lobbytrack97/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
97
Teamgo97/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability. Lobbytrack has the stronger published signal here.
100
Lobbytrack100/100Published ongoing free planPublished vendor and profile signals
45
Teamgo45/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. Lobbytrack has the stronger published signal here.
100
Lobbytrack100/10020 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
40
Teamgo40/1008 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit.
100
Lobbytrack100/1009 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
100
Teamgo100/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory.
100
Lobbytrack100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 7 review sources captured24 source pages analysed
100
Teamgo100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured24 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.
100
Lobbytrack100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
100
Teamgo100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
67
Lobbytrack67/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
TeamgoNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.
70
Lobbytrack70/100Regional hosting signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
100
Teamgo100/100AustraliaPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.
100
Lobbytrack100/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals
100
Teamgo100/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Key differences

FactorLobbytrackTeamgoBuyer meaning
Deployment & hostingPublic pages do not specify hosting region, SLAs, or data-residency options.States cloud hosting on AWS with regional hosting options (Australia, UK, US) and lists guided-setup deployment posture.If your organization requires known cloud region options or specific hosting SLAs out of the box, Teamgo surfaces region choices publicly while Lobbytrack will require direct confirmation of hosting/residency and SLA commitments.
Pricing postureAdvertises an ongoing free Starter plan and paid tiers available by contact/quote; public pages do not publish paid-tier prices or limits.Publishes fixed monthly plans (Essential $29, Advance $99, Complete $199) and a 30-day free trial; enterprise pricing by quote.Teamgo enables quicker cost modelling from public prices; Lobbytrack may be more flexible or negotiable but requires vendor engagement to understand production pricing and plan limits.
Mobile apps & first-party appsExplicit three first-party apps (Lobby App for kiosks, Employee App, Guard App) across web, iOS, Android and Windows.Provides kiosk apps, Teamgo Pass mobile app for visitors/staff, and mobile support (iOS/Android) with geofencing; emphasis on unlimited kiosks and smartphone-driven sign-in.Lobbytrack emphasizes role-specific first-party apps including a Guard App for security workflows; Teamgo emphasises mobile Pass app and geofencing for distributed/mobile staff and unlimited kiosk scalability.
Identity verification & screeningSupports driver-license scanning, watchlist checks and customizable screening questions; ID scanning is explicit.Supports photo capture and optional FaceID facial recognition, watch/deny lists and health screening; ID-scan specifics less prominently stated.If government ID scanning is required (for example, driver-license OCR), Lobbytrack lists license scanning explicitly; Teamgo highlights biometric FaceID and photo flows which may better suit mobile/quick identity confirmation.
Contractor managementPublic pages reference contractor management signals but do not publish detailed contractor induction/document-expiry workflows in the supplied pages.Publishes contractor compliance workflows including document requests, inductions and expiry monitoring.For formal contractor onboarding and expiry tracking, Teamgo documents dedicated contractor/compliance workflows publicly; Lobbytrack may support contractor use-cases but buyers should validate detailed contractor features and reporting.
Evacuation & emergency workflowsProvides evacuation lists and emergency messaging via the Guard App (real-time evacuation lists called out).Includes emergency activation, evacuation mode and on-site real-time reporting as a published feature.Both vendors publish real-time evacuation/roll-call capabilities; Lobbytrack ties evacuation into a Guard App for security staff while Teamgo presents evacuation as part of core platform dashboards and mobile alerts—choose based on whether you need a dedicated
Access-control integrationsMentions access-control card management and AD/SSO integrations (Okta/Azure AD) on product pages; specific third-party access-control vendors/models not published.Mentions Azure/Active Directory integration and some badge-printer compatibility notes but detailed connector/SCIM/API specifics are not fully listed publicly.Both vendors list AD/SSO and card/badge management capabilities; if you require verified integrations with particular door hardware or SCIM/API depth, both require vendor confirmation—Teamgo lists some integration breadth publicly but neither publishes exhaust
Hardware compatibility & kiosk behaviorReferences optional kiosks, badge printers and barcode/ID scanners but does not publish exact supported models on public pages.Offers free iPad/Android kiosk apps, mentions offline kiosk sync and references common printer models (for example, Brother QL) in guidance (but detailed lists vary).Teamgo publishes more concrete kiosk behaviors (offline sync) and naming of commonly supported printer families; Lobbytrack lists kiosk and printer support but buyers should validate exact models and offline behavior for both.

Choose Lobbytrack when

  • An explicit Guard app with evacuation/guard workflows integrated into the VMS.
  • You prefer a vendor that publishes a free Starter plan to pilot visitor workflows.
  • Your use-case needs explicit driver-license scanning and watchlist checks as described on public product pages.
  • Integrated guard/evacuation workflows plus touchless kiosk check-in and badge printing.
  • An entry-level free plan to pilot visitor workflows in small offices.

Choose Teamgo when

  • Published, fixed monthly pricing to model costs quickly without vendor engagement.
  • Documented regional AWS hosting options or need geofencing/automatic mobile check-in for distributed staff.
  • Unlimited kiosks and offline kiosk sync behavior described publicly.
  • One platform must cover visitors, employees and contractors.
  • Multiple check-in modes are useful across offices, sites or mobile teams.

Lobbytrack fit considerations

  • Limited reporting customization and difficult reporting
  • Printer compatibility and label/print-resolution issues
  • Limited integration options for some use cases
  • Admin interface could use refinement
  • Limited privileged-user/role granularity

Teamgo fit considerations

  • The product spans many modules, so plan selection and workflow design should be part of the evaluation.
  • Kiosk-led deployments may require operational decisions about BYO devices, mounting and printers:
  • Geofencing introduces mobile-app and location-permission dependencies:
  • The broad feature set may require careful tier and add-on selection for teams seeking a narrowly scoped reception workflow.
  • Kiosk deployments involve device, mounting and printer decisions even though the software supports BYO devices

What appears similar

  • Both vendors support iOS and Android kiosk apps, QR code/contactless check-in, badge printing and visitor pre-registration.
  • Both publish evacuation and emergency roll-call capabilities; Lobbytrack situates evacuation in a Guard App while Teamgo exposes it via core dashboards and mobile alerts.
  • Both list AD/SSO integration support; neither publishes exhaustive lists of supported physical access-control devices on supplied public pages.
  • Both support photo capture and watch/deny lists; Lobbytrack emphasizes driver-license OCR while Teamgo highlights FaceID and mobile pass flows.

Fit questions

  • Which system better matches your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?
  • Which platform fits your current workplace, identity, messaging, and access-control stack?
  • Which rollout path is easiest for your locations, support model, and budget?
MetricLobbytrackTeamgo
Customer review sentiment4. 7/5 from 151 published reviews across 7 sources, with 127 stored feedback themes4. 4/5 from 83 published reviews across 4 sources, with 133 stored feedback themes
Visitor and contractor workflows5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals
Evacuation management2 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals2 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals
Advanced reporting3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals
Published feature breadth32 documented capabilities12 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityiOS and Android; Optional kioskiOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free planFree trial published
Deployment and integrations20 published deployment and integration options8 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage9 documented sectors13 documented sectors
Published evidence24 vendor pages analysed, 7 review sources captured24 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations2 access-control integration signalsNo access-control integration evidence captured
Regional hostingRegional hosting signal publishedAustralia
Pricing transparency1 published pricing plan4 published pricing plans
Best forOrganizations replacing paper visitor logs with digital check-in, Schools needing visitor screening, badges, and evacuation visibility, Healthcare facilities managing visitor registration and notifications, Government facilities requiring watchlist checks and controlled visitor access, Workplaces managing visitors, employee attendance, and shared spaces, Multi-location organizations needing centralized visitor activity, Front-desk/reception teams wanting faster visitor check-in and badge printing, Security teams that need watchlist alerts and evacuation listsWorkplaces replacing paper sign-in with automated visitor, employee and contractor check-in, Organisations needing configurable visitor inductions, document collection and compliance records, Multi-site teams using iPad, Android, QR-code or mobile check-in, Construction, logistics and field-work organisations needing contractor or geofenced attendance visibility, Schools, charities and not-for-profits seeking self-service check-in and emergency communications, Security-conscious workplaces requiring screening, watch lists, deny lists and capacity alerts
Comparison positioningLobbytrack positions as an easy-to-use, multi-app visitor-management platform with built-in screening, badge printing and evacuation features suited from small offices to enterprise and government.Teamgo compares as a broad, workflow-oriented visitor platform combining visitor, employee, contractor, kiosk, QR-code and geofencing use cases with published tier pricing.
Best-fit signalsChoose Lobbytrack when you need integrated guard/evacuation workflows plus touchless kiosk check-in and badge printing., Choose Lobbytrack when you want an entry-level free plan to pilot visitor workflows in small offices.Choose Teamgo when one platform must cover visitors, employees and contractors., Choose it when multiple check-in modes are useful across offices, sites or mobile teams., Choose it when configurable compliance workflows and exportable reporting matter.

Teamgo

www.teamgo.co

  • Custom inductions, forms, document requests and QR-code issuance are built into the workflow model:
  • Depth of contractor induction and document workflows
  • high confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system