Visitor management system comparison

MyLobby vs SecurePoint Visitor

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. SecurePoint Visitor has published signals around You must generate audit-ready evidence for ITAR/DFARS/CMMC and need integrated sanctions screening plus badge/escort controls, Explicit focus on ITAR/EAR/CMMC evidence packs and 10-year append-only audit retention, and Human-reviewed adjudication integrated into the visit lifecycle rather than separate screening services. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

MyLobby

SecurePoint Visitor

CriteriaMyLobbySecurePoint Visitor

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.

MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources

SecurePoint VisitorNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured

Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.

MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor68/1006 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. SecurePoint Visitor has the stronger published signal here.

MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor93/10021 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. SecurePoint Visitor has the stronger published signal here.

MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.

MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor83/10018 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. SecurePoint Visitor has the stronger published signal here.

MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. SecurePoint Visitor has the stronger published signal here.

MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed

SecurePoint Visitor82/10021 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured21 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.

MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor73/10080% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.

MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor60/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint VisitorNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. SecurePoint Visitor has the stronger published signal here.

MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

SecurePoint Visitor93/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose MyLobby when

Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
Contractor management

Choose SecurePoint Visitor when

You must generate audit-ready evidence for ITAR/DFARS/CMMC and need integrated sanctions screening plus badge/escort controls.
Explicit focus on ITAR/EAR/CMMC evidence packs and 10-year append-only audit retention
Human-reviewed adjudication integrated into the visit lifecycle rather than separate screening services
Defense contractors and regulated manufacturers needing ITAR/EAR/CMMC evidence
Compliance teams requiring immutable audit trails and exportable evidence

MyLobby fit considerations

Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?

SecurePoint Visitor fit considerations

Clarify hosting region and SLA/security controls if your organization has strict data residency requirements
Assess badge/hardware compatibility with on-site printers and kiosks
Validate evidence export formats meet assessor/C3PAO expectations
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

Metric	MyLobby	SecurePoint Visitor
Customer review sentiment	4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source	No review score listed
Visitor workflow depth	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals	6 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth	8 documented capabilities	21 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibility	iOS and Android; Optional kiosk	iOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Ongoing free access	Free trial published	Free trial published
Deployment and integrations	0 published deployment and integration options	18 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	4 documented sectors	7 documented sectors
Published evidence	12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured	21 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	No access-control integration evidence captured	2 access-control integration signals
Pricing transparency	Pricing page published	4 published pricing plans
Comparison positioning	Compare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.	SecurePoint Visitor positions itself as a compliance-first VMS for regulated facilities that need audit-defensible evidence for export controls and CMMC readiness.
Best-fit signals	Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.	Choose SecurePoint Visitor when you must generate audit-ready evidence for ITAR/DFARS/CMMC and need integrated sanctions screening plus badge/escort controls.
Pricing information	Pricing includes se Study Contact Us Support New Features MyLobby Visitor Management Pricing Packages Lite $45 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial QR...; een with the company logo Email Notification Ability to send notification via email Basic $85 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; compliance in the facility while also substantially speeding up your workflows. Standard $179 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; lete the submission. This is a great way to ensure every entry is compliant. Professional $249 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Ma...	Education plans shown on education page include per-campus pricing (see source).

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

Contractor management
How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
low confidence

View full profile

SecurePoint Visitor

www.securepointusa.com

Explicit focus on ITAR/EAR/CMMC evidence packs and 10-year append-only audit retention
high confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system