Visitor Management Systems

Visitor management system comparison

MyLobby vs Tango Visitor

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. Tango Visitor has published signals around Visitor management tightly integrated with occupancy analytics and you plan an enterprise rollout supported by vendor services, Emphasis on combining visitor workflows with occupancy analytics and space-usage insights provided by Tango, and Enterprises seeking centralized visitor management. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

51
MyLobby
41
Tango Visitor
CriteriaMyLobbyTango Visitor
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.
69
MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources
75
Tango Visitor75/1004. 2/5 from 23 published reviews across 4 sources, with 20 stored feedback themes23 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
81
MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
68
Tango Visitor68/1006 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
Tango Visitor31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
78
MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
34
Tango Visitor34/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
38
MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
Tango VisitorNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
NE
MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
3
Tango Visitor3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. Tango Visitor has the stronger published signal here.
37
MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
60
Tango Visitor60/1006 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
58
MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed
37
Tango Visitor37/1003 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured3 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.
93
MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Tango Visitor93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
Tango VisitorNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
Tango VisitorNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.
68
MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
Tango VisitorNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose MyLobby when

  • Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
  • Contractor management

Choose Tango Visitor when

  • Visitor management tightly integrated with occupancy analytics and you plan an enterprise rollout supported by vendor services.
  • Emphasis on combining visitor workflows with occupancy analytics and space-usage insights provided by Tango.
  • Medium-to-large enterprises and workplaces that already use or plan to use Tango’s platform and need integrated occupancy analytics with visitor workflows
  • Tango Visitor publishes integration with tango platform in integrations.
  • Tango Visitor publishes pre-registration in visitor journey.

MyLobby fit considerations

  • Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
  • Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
  • Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?

Tango Visitor fit considerations

  • Room information can be outdated or displayed capabilities inaccurate
  • Some workflows are overly complicated and may not meet every user requirement
  • Room information can be outdated
  • Displayed room capabilities may be inaccurate
  • Some aspects are overly complicated
MetricMyLobbyTango Visitor
Customer review sentiment4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source4. 2/5 from 23 published reviews across 4 sources, with 20 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals6 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations0 published deployment and integration options2 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage4 documented sectors6 documented sectors
Published evidence12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured3 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrationsNo access-control integration evidence capturedNo access-control integration evidence captured
Comparison positioningCompare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.Tango Visitor is positioned as an enterprise-grade visitor management solution tightly aligned with Tango’s occupancy and workplace analytics platform.
Best-fit signalsConsider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.Choose Tango Visitor when you need visitor management tightly integrated with occupancy analytics and you plan an enterprise rollout supported by vendor services.

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

  • Contractor management
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • low confidence
View full profile
TV

Tango Visitor

www.tangosoftware.com

  • Emphasis on combining visitor workflows with occupancy analytics and space-usage insights provided by Tango.
  • Depth of analytics and reporting integration with existing workplace systems
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system