Visitor management system comparison

ProVisit vs Tango Visitor

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

ProVisit has published signals around Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements, Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages, and Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting. Tango Visitor has published signals around Visitor management tightly integrated with occupancy analytics and you plan an enterprise rollout supported by vendor services, Emphasis on combining visitor workflows with occupancy analytics and space-usage insights provided by Tango, and Enterprises seeking centralized visitor management. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

ProVisit

Tango Visitor

CriteriaProVisitTango Visitor

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. ProVisit has the stronger published signal here.

ProVisit87/1005. 0/5 from 327 published reviews across 1 source, with 12 stored feedback themes327 reviews across review sources

Tango Visitor75/1004. 2/5 from 23 published reviews across 4 sources, with 13 stored feedback themes23 reviews across review sources

Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows. ProVisit has the stronger published signal here.

ProVisit81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango Visitor68/1006 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.

ProVisit31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango Visitor31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals.

ProVisit34/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango Visitor34/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

ProVisitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango VisitorNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.

ProVisit3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango Visitor3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. ProVisit has the stronger published signal here.

ProVisit93/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango Visitor60/1006 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. ProVisit has the stronger published signal here.

ProVisit79/10019 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured19 source pages analysed

Tango Visitor37/1003 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured3 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. Tango Visitor has the stronger published signal here.

ProVisit73/10080% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango Visitor93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.

ProVisit26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango VisitorNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

ProVisitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango Visitor63/100Regional hosting signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.

ProVisit93/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals

Tango VisitorNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose ProVisit when

Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements
Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting
Mid-to-large organisations needing contractor onboarding, multi-site visibility and compliance audit trails
ProVisit publishes sign-in control & approvals in security & compliance.

Choose Tango Visitor when

Visitor management tightly integrated with occupancy analytics and you plan an enterprise rollout supported by vendor services.
Emphasis on combining visitor workflows with occupancy analytics and space-usage insights provided by Tango.
Medium-to-large enterprises and workplaces that already use or plan to use Tango’s platform and need integrated occupancy analytics with visitor workflows
Tango Visitor publishes integration with tango platform in integrations.
Tango Visitor publishes pre-registration in visitor journey.

ProVisit fit considerations

No public pricing tiers — procurement requires a tailored quote
Hosting region and specific mobile platform support are not specified on public pages
Assess kiosk hardware options and integration with existing access control
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

Tango Visitor fit considerations

Public pages describe capabilities and demo invites but do not provide published pricing, regional hosting, or detailed third-party integration lists—these must be confirmed with Tango.
Depth of analytics and reporting integration with existing workplace systems
Available methods for unattended check-in (kiosk vs QR) and hardware compatibility
Implementation services and enterprise rollout support
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

Metric	ProVisit	Tango Visitor
Customer review sentiment	5. 0/5 from 327 published reviews across 1 source, with 12 stored feedback themes	4. 2/5 from 23 published reviews across 4 sources, with 13 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals	6 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth	8 documented capabilities	8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations	2 published deployment and integration options	2 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	13 documented sectors	6 documented sectors
Published evidence	19 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured	3 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	1 access-control integration signal	No access-control integration evidence captured
Best for	Buyer seeking paperless visitor/contractor sign-in and audit trails, Organisations needing contractor onboarding and permit workflows, Multi-site operators wanting central visibility of who’s on site, Teams requiring fast contactless arrivals (QR codes) and badge printing, Organisations that want mobile evacuation/roll-call capability	Enterprises seeking centralized visitor management, Workplaces requiring occupancy insights and analytics, Organizations wanting customizable check-in flows (deliveries, contractors, events), Facilities aiming to automate front-desk check-in and host notifications, Teams that already use or plan to use Tango workplace solutions
Comparison positioning	ProVisit positions itself as a compliance-first UK visitor and contractor management platform with kiosk, QR and contractor onboarding features and tailored pricing.	Tango Visitor is positioned as an enterprise-grade visitor management solution tightly aligned with Tango’s occupancy and workplace analytics platform.
Best-fit signals	Choose ProVisit when contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements	Choose Tango Visitor when you need visitor management tightly integrated with occupancy analytics and you plan an enterprise rollout supported by vendor services.

ProVisit

www.provisit.co.uk

Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
medium confidence

View full profile

Tango Visitor

www.tangosoftware.com

Emphasis on combining visitor workflows with occupancy analytics and space-usage insights provided by Tango.
Depth of analytics and reporting integration with existing workplace systems
medium confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system