Visitor management system comparison

ProVisit vs VMEasy

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

ProVisit has published signals around Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements, Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages, and Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting. VMEasy has published signals around You prioritise a low-hardware, touchless visitor flow and need education-specific integrations, Modular add-ons rather than an all-in-one fixed tier, and Emphasis on fully touchless QR-based mobile sign-in without mandatory hardware. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

54
ProVisit
47
VMEasy
CriteriaProVisitVMEasy
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.
87
ProVisit87/1005. 0/5 from 327 published reviews across 1 source, with 12 stored feedback themes327 reviews across review sources
NE
VMEasyNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
ProVisit81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
VMEasy81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
ProVisit31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
VMEasy31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. VMEasy has the stronger published signal here.
34
ProVisit34/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
90
VMEasy90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
NE
ProVisitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
38
VMEasy38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. VMEasy has the stronger published signal here.
3
ProVisit3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
48
VMEasy48/10011 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. ProVisit has the stronger published signal here.
93
ProVisit93/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
71
VMEasy71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. ProVisit has the stronger published signal here.
79
ProVisit79/10019 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured19 source pages analysed
20
VMEasy20/1003 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured3 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. VMEasy has the stronger published signal here.
73
ProVisit73/10080% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
VMEasy93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems. VMEasy has the stronger published signal here.
26
ProVisit26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals
60
VMEasy60/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
ProVisitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
63
VMEasy63/100Regional hosting signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.
93
ProVisit93/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals
93
VMEasy93/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose ProVisit when

  • Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements
  • Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
  • Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting
  • Mid-to-large organisations needing contractor onboarding, multi-site visibility and compliance audit trails
  • ProVisit publishes sign-in control & approvals in security & compliance.

Choose VMEasy when

  • You prioritise a low-hardware, touchless visitor flow and need education-specific integrations.
  • Modular add-ons rather than an all-in-one fixed tier.
  • Emphasis on fully touchless QR-based mobile sign-in without mandatory hardware
  • Education-focused module with MIS integration and DBS capture
  • Vendor offers both pass printing and access-control integration options

ProVisit fit considerations

  • No public pricing tiers — procurement requires a tailored quote
  • Hosting region and specific mobile platform support are not specified on public pages
  • Assess kiosk hardware options and integration with existing access control
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

VMEasy fit considerations

  • Obtain detailed pricing for multi-site and access-control integration before committing.
  • Pricing structure beyond a stated starting price and module add-ons is not detailed on site
  • Compare total cost of ownership including required add-on modules and optional hardware
  • Assess depth of access-control integrations and whether vendor-led surveys are required
  • Check reporting/export capabilities and emergency mustering workflow
MetricProVisitVMEasy
Customer review sentiment5. 0/5 from 327 published reviews across 1 source, with 12 stored feedback themesNo review score listed
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations2 published deployment and integration options11 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage13 documented sectors7 documented sectors
Published evidence19 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured3 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured
Visitor management focus80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations1 access-control integration signal2 access-control integration signals
Pricing transparency1 published pricing plan4 published pricing plans
Best forBuyer seeking paperless visitor/contractor sign-in and audit trails, Organisations needing contractor onboarding and permit workflows, Multi-site operators wanting central visibility of who’s on site, Teams requiring fast contactless arrivals (QR codes) and badge printing, Organisations that want mobile evacuation/roll-call capabilityReception teams replacing pen-and-paper sign-in, Organisations requiring touchless sign-in (post-Covid hygiene), Multi-site organisations needing shared databases, Schools requiring MIS integration and DBS recording, Sites needing evacuation reports and visitor audit trails
Comparison positioningProVisit positions itself as a compliance-first UK visitor and contractor management platform with kiosk, QR and contractor onboarding features and tailored pricing.VMEasy positions as a modular, low-hardware visitor management solution emphasising touchless QR sign-in and add-on modules for education, printing and access control.
Best-fit signalsChoose ProVisit when contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirementsChoose VMEasy when you prioritise a low-hardware, touchless visitor flow and need education-specific integrations., Choose when you want modular add-ons rather than an all-in-one fixed tier.
Pricing informationWebsite states pricing is tailored to requirements and that ProVisit will prepare a no-obligation quote; no fixed public plans are shownSite references a base annual subscription and additional paid modules; a starting price of £295 is mentioned on the overview page.

ProVisit

www.provisit.co.uk

  • Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
  • medium confidence
View full profile

VMEasy

www.vmeasy.co.uk

  • Emphasis on fully touchless QR-based mobile sign-in without mandatory hardware
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system