| Buyer fit & target use cases | VISIT targets enterprise and regulated industries (manufacturing, logistics, healthcare, government) with multi-site, yard and truck workflows and compliance/audit requirements. | VisitorPad targets property managers and reception-led sites prioritising a branded cloud-hosted front-desk experience for offices, schools and events in the UK. | Choose VISIT if you need yard/logistics features, sanctions/identity checks and multi-site enterprise controls. Choose VisitorPad if you want a cloud-first, branded receptionist-focused experience for property management and simpler front-desk workflows. |
|---|
| Deployment & hosting options | Offers both cloud hosting in ASTRUM IT’s German data centre and on‑premise installations. | Positioned as cloud-based only on the public site; hosting region/data residency not published. | VISIT is a fit when on‑premise or specific regional hosting is required; VisitorPad fits buyers comfortable with vendor-hosted cloud but must confirm hosting region and compliance. |
|---|
| Hardware requirements & kiosk support | Documents optional kiosk hardware and peripherals (card printers, scanners, QR-code readers, card dispensers). | Public site does not publish recommended kiosk or peripheral hardware guidance. | VISIT better serves projects planning integrated kiosks and badge printing; VisitorPad may still support kiosks but buyers should ask for hardware recommendations and supported devices. |
|---|
| Visitor journey & identity verification | Includes pre-registration, online check-in, QR/PIN entry, identity/document verification and sanction-list checks as part of workflows. | Emphasises a streamlined check-in and branded welcome screen; identity/document verification and sanction-check capabilities are not documented on public pages. | If identity verification, sanctions screening or document capture are required, VISIT is the stronger documented fit. VisitorPad is likely sufficient for straightforward visitor check-in and branding needs but requires confirmation for advanced ID checks. |
|---|
| Contractor and induction workflows | Provides contractor/visitor induction modules and logistics/yard modules for LKW/truck workflows. | Public pages do not document contractor induction or yard/logistics features. | VISIT is a better fit for sites needing contractor induction, compliance training, and logistics coordination. Buyer using VisitorPad should ask whether contractor workflows and inductions are supported. |
|---|
| Evacuation / emergency attendance lists | Explicitly supports evacuation/attendance lists and emergency reporting. | Evacuation support is not documented on the public site. | Choose VISIT when the ability to generate evacuation lists is mandatory. For VisitorPad, confirm emergency mustering capabilities before procurement. |
|---|
| Access-control & systems integration | Documents VISIT Connect webservice API and explicit interfaces to access-control, room-management and guest‑WiFi voucher systems. | Integration surface is not described publicly; calendar, SSO and access-control integrations are suggested topics to confirm. | VISIT suits buyers needing documented API and access-control linkage. VisitorPad buyers must verify available integrations (SSO, calendar, access-control) during evaluation. |
|---|
| Pricing posture & procurement readiness | No published prices; site lists product modules and recommends procurement conversations; describes process-cost reduction figures but not pricing tiers. | No published prices; site invites demo/contact to obtain pricing and details. | Both require direct vendor engagement for pricing. Expect procurement discussions for both; VISIT may present modular licensing due to named modules, VisitorPad likely negotiates per-site or SaaS plans but must be confirmed. |
|---|
