Visitor management system comparison

Visitly vs VMEasy

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Visitly has published signals around Procurement requires SOC 2 / ISO 27001 artifacts and IT requires SSO/SCIM without premium tier gating, SSO and core security features included at lower tiers (described differentiation vs Envoy), and One product/one contract approach contrasted with iLobby module stacking. VMEasy has published signals around You prioritise a low-hardware, touchless visitor flow and need education-specific integrations, Modular add-ons rather than an all-in-one fixed tier, and Emphasis on fully touchless QR-based mobile sign-in without mandatory hardware. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

69
Visitly
47
VMEasy
CriteriaVisitlyVMEasy
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.
87
Visitly87/1004. 4/5 from 212 published reviews across 5 sources, with 42 stored feedback themes212 reviews across review sources
NE
VMEasyNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
Visitly81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
VMEasy81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
Visitly31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
VMEasy31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. VMEasy has the stronger published signal here.
78
Visitly78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
90
VMEasy90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
38
Visitly38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
38
VMEasy38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
43
Visitly43/10010 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
48
VMEasy48/10011 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. Visitly has the stronger published signal here.
93
Visitly93/10012 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
71
VMEasy71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. Visitly has the stronger published signal here.
75
Visitly75/10013 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured13 source pages analysed
20
VMEasy20/1003 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured3 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.
93
Visitly93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
VMEasy93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems. Visitly has the stronger published signal here.
93
Visitly93/1003 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
60
VMEasy60/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
VisitlyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
63
VMEasy63/100Regional hosting signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.
93
Visitly93/1003 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals
93
VMEasy93/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose Visitly when

  • Procurement requires SOC 2 / ISO 27001 artifacts and IT requires SSO/SCIM without premium tier gating
  • SSO and core security features included at lower tiers (described differentiation vs Envoy)
  • One product/one contract approach contrasted with iLobby module stacking
  • Buy when you need enterprise-grade identity integration (SSO/SCIM) and compliance evidence in one visitor-management product
  • Visitly publishes contractor management in contractor management.

Choose VMEasy when

  • You prioritise a low-hardware, touchless visitor flow and need education-specific integrations.
  • Modular add-ons rather than an all-in-one fixed tier.
  • Emphasis on fully touchless QR-based mobile sign-in without mandatory hardware
  • Education-focused module with MIS integration and DBS capture
  • Vendor offers both pass printing and access-control integration options

Visitly fit considerations

  • Published per-location pricing and exact support SLAs vary by plan and may require direct quote for Enterprise
  • Which PACS/CCTV vendors you need supported and whether that support is included in your target tier
  • Required compliance evidence (SOC2/ISO/BAA/NIST mappings) and NDA access to reports pre-contract
  • Operational rollout complexity across multi-site deployments (SCIM, SIEM, HRIS integrations)
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

VMEasy fit considerations

  • Obtain detailed pricing for multi-site and access-control integration before committing.
  • Pricing structure beyond a stated starting price and module add-ons is not detailed on site
  • Compare total cost of ownership including required add-on modules and optional hardware
  • Assess depth of access-control integrations and whether vendor-led surveys are required
  • Check reporting/export capabilities and emergency mustering workflow
MetricVisitlyVMEasy
Customer review sentiment4. 4/5 from 212 published reviews across 5 sources, with 42 stored feedback themesNo review score listed
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityiOS and Android; Optional kioskiOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Ongoing free accessFree trial publishedFree trial published
Deployment and integrations10 published deployment and integration options11 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage12 documented sectors7 documented sectors
Published evidence13 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured3 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations3 access-control integration signals2 access-control integration signals
Pricing transparency3 published pricing plans4 published pricing plans
Best forCorporate Security teams seeking defensible visitor records (watchlists, escort workflows), IT / InfoSec owners needing SSO, SCIM and SIEM integration, Facilities & Operations for multi-site lobby/day-to-day operations, EHS / Safety teams requiring PPE attestations and evacuation roll calls, Compliance teams running ITAR / CMMC / HIPAA evidence packagesReception teams replacing pen-and-paper sign-in, Organisations requiring touchless sign-in (post-Covid hygiene), Multi-site organisations needing shared databases, Schools requiring MIS integration and DBS recording, Sites needing evacuation reports and visitor audit trails
Comparison positioningVisitly positions itself as a security-first, single-contract visitor-management product that avoids multi-module stacking and tier-gating of enterprise controls.VMEasy positions as a modular, low-hardware visitor management solution emphasising touchless QR sign-in and add-on modules for education, printing and access control.
Best-fit signalsChoose Visitly when procurement requires SOC 2 / ISO 27001 artifacts and IT requires SSO/SCIM without premium tier gatingChoose VMEasy when you prioritise a low-hardware, touchless visitor flow and need education-specific integrations., Choose when you want modular add-ons rather than an all-in-one fixed tier.
Pricing informationThree published tiers (Starter, Business, Enterprise). Starter and Business show standard published price points and site limits; Enterprise is quoted with custom annual or multi-year contract. 14-day free trial available; monthly billing carries a premium on lower tiers. See pricing page for per-plan details.Site references a base annual subscription and additional paid modules; a starting price of £295 is mentioned on the overview page.

Visitly

www.visitly.io

  • SSO and core security features included at lower tiers (described differentiation vs Envoy)
  • Which PACS/CCTV vendors you need supported and whether that support is included in your target tier
  • high confidence
View full profile

VMEasy

www.vmeasy.co.uk

  • Emphasis on fully touchless QR-based mobile sign-in without mandatory hardware
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system