Visitor Management SystemsVisitor management system comparison
A side-by-side view of the directory’s published evidence and scoring metrics. The information is provided to support your evaluation; it does not declare a winner.
AI comparison summary
Side-by-side comparison of Fidentity and VISIT focused on buyer fit, deployment, hardware, visitor journey, contractor management, evacuation, access control, pricing posture, reviews/evidence confidence, and procurement questions. Comparison highlights differences where stated or where information is missing.
Evidence confidence: low
| Factor | Fidentity | VISIT | Buyer meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer fit / target sectors | Fidentity lists Enterprise, Compliance, Workplace and claims support for visitors, employees, deliveries, events; mentions facial recognition and multisite management. | VISIT lists Schools, Workplace, Enterprise and emphasizes yard/vehicle management and logistics as well as security, facility, HR and safety teams. | Choose Fidentity if you prioritize features for events, deliveries, and identity verification (facial recognition) across multisite corporate/compliance environments. Choose VISIT if you need stronger yard/vehicle/logistics and school-site workflows and an emp |
| Deployment options | Described as cloud-based only in provided data. | Explicitly available as cloud or on-premise. | If your organisation requires on-premise deployment for air-gapped or stricter data residency/compliance needs, VISIT explicitly supports it; Fidentity appears cloud-first. |
| Hardware & yard/vehicle management | No published details about hardware flexibility or yard/vehicle handling; hardware flexibility is listed as unpublished. | VISIT references yard management and vehicle movements, implying integrated vehicle/yard workflows; hardware flexibility not published but platform-level yard features exist. | For sites that need vehicle/yard tracking, VISIT better signals that capability. For kiosk/hardware flexibility needs, neither vendor publishes clear details—plan to validate supported devices. |
| Visitor journey & feature emphasis | Fidentity highlights touchless check-in, mobile/QR registration, facial recognition, e-badges, visitor photo capture, host notifications, emergency notifications, reporting, multisite management, and integrations. | VISIT emphasizes digitized visitor registration, safety briefings, access-related processes, real-time activity tracking, and vehicle movements; modular approach. | Pick Fidentity when identity verification, touchless and badge-based office visitor experiences are priority. Pick VISIT when you need structured safety briefings, real-time activity tracking and modular workflows including vehicle/yard flows. |
| Contractor / contractor management | No specific contractor management capabilities published in the provided Fidentity data. | VISIT’s yard and logistics focus implies contractor/vehicle contractor workflows may be supported, but contractor-specific features are not explicitly published. | If contractor onboarding/permit-to-work is critical, VISIT is a more likely fit based on yard/logistics emphasis but both vendors require validation on explicit contractor workflow support. |
| Evacuation / emergency management | Fidentity lists emergency notifications and multisite management but no detailed evacuation mustering or drill workflows published. | VISIT mentions real-time activity tracking which could support evacuation accounting; no explicit evacuation/mustering workflow published. | Both vendors show partial signals for emergency response (Fidentity: emergency notifications; VISIT: real-time tracking). Buyers should validate mustering list generation, offline capability, and emergency communication channels for each. |
| Access control integration | Fidentity notes integrations but does not publish specific access control (physical access control system) integrations in provided data. | VISIT references access-related processes but does not publish which access control systems it integrates with. | Neither vendor provides explicit evidence of PACS integration in the provided data—buyers should request an access-control integration matrix and supported protocols (e.g., S2, Honeywell, OpenPath). |
| Pricing posture | Pricing page mentions $9.99 and $39.99 (no plan names or what’s included). | No pricing published in the provided data. | Fidentity provides some low-level price points (verify what they cover and whether they are per-user, per-site, or per-month). For VISIT, prepare to request a quote or pricing tiers; assume custom pricing for on-premise deployments. |
Confirm pricing, implementation effort, integrations, support terms, and data handling.
Confirm pricing, implementation effort, integrations, support terms, and data handling.
| Metric | Fidentity | VISIT |
|---|---|---|
| Recommended score | 84/100 | 83/100 |
| Visitor workflow depth | 0 specialised workflow signals | 0 specialised workflow signals |
| Customer review sentiment | 2.9/5 from 2 published reviews | No verified review score |
| AI evidence confidence | No AI analysis yet | No AI analysis yet |
| Published evidence | No crawled profile yet | No crawled profile yet |
| Best for | Enterprise, Compliance, Workplace | Schools, Workplace, Enterprise |
| Pricing information | Pricing mentions $9.99, $39.99 | Not published |
fidentity.com
Fidentity is a cloud-based visitor, employee, delivery, and event management platform that provides touchless workplace check-in, mobile and QR-code registration, facial recognition, e-badges, visitor photo capture, host notifications, emergency notifications, reporting, multisite management, and integrations.
View full profilewww.astrum-it.de
VISIT is modular visitor and yard management software from ASTRUM IT. It digitizes visitor registration, safety briefings, access-related processes, real-time activity tracking, and vehicle movements. The platform is available as a cloud or on-premise solution and is designed for security, facility, HR, workplace safety, and logistics teams.
View full profileMetrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, verified review sources and crawler evidence. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.