Visitor management system comparison

EntriScan vs KeepnTrack

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

EntriScan has published signals around Rapid deployment, low friction attendee experience (no app), and built-in member management for clubs, schools, or events, Per-member QR codes and shareable profile pages for faster individual check-ins, and Free forever tier plus clear mid-market Community plan with advanced reporting. KeepnTrack has published signals around Combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits), Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management, and Preconfigured custom printers/scanners sold to work with the system. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

EntriScan

KeepnTrack

CriteriaEntriScanKeepnTrack

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.

EntriScanNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured

KeepnTrack73/1004. 0/5 from 40 published reviews across 4 sources, with 23 stored feedback themes40 reviews across review sources

Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows. KeepnTrack has the stronger published signal here.

EntriScan56/1005 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.

EntriScan31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. EntriScan has the stronger published signal here.

EntriScan93/100iOS and Android; Software onlyPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack30/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

EntriScan73/100Free access signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. EntriScan has the stronger published signal here.

EntriScan13/1004 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. EntriScan has the stronger published signal here.

EntriScan93/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. KeepnTrack has the stronger published signal here.

EntriScan78/10020 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured20 source pages analysed

KeepnTrack93/10024 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. KeepnTrack has the stronger published signal here.

EntriScan53/10060% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.

EntriScanNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

EntriScanNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrackNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. EntriScan has the stronger published signal here.

EntriScan93/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

KeepnTrack68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose EntriScan when

Rapid deployment, low friction attendee experience (no app), and built-in member management for clubs, schools, or events.
Per-member QR codes and shareable profile pages for faster individual check-ins
Free forever tier plus clear mid-market Community plan with advanced reporting
Mobile browser-based scanning (no app) and 5-minute setup positioning for self-serve adoption
Small-to-medium community organizations, clubs, schools, studios, and event hosts who want low-friction mobile check-in.

Choose KeepnTrack when

Combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits).
Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management
Preconfigured custom printers/scanners sold to work with the system
K–12 and higher‑education campuses needing student and visitor management
Organizations running volunteer programs that require hour tracking and applicant workflows

EntriScan fit considerations

Security and hosting statements are high-level (enterprise-grade described) but lack technical detail on encryption, certifications, or regional data hosting
Validate API capabilities, available integrations, and event throughput for peak check-in periods.
Assess location verification reliability in your geographic/indoor environment.
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

KeepnTrack fit considerations

Assess hardware costs and logistics when using vendor-supplied printers/scanners.
Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
How well does KeepnTrack match your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?

Metric	EntriScan	KeepnTrack
Customer review sentiment	No review score listed	4. 0/5 from 40 published reviews across 4 sources, with 23 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth	5 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth	8 documented capabilities	8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations	4 published deployment and integration options	2 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	13 documented sectors	7 documented sectors
Published evidence	20 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured	24 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	60% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	No access-control integration evidence captured	No access-control integration evidence captured
Pricing transparency	4 published pricing plans	Pricing page published
Best for	Small clubs and community groups (fast QR check-in, free tier), Schools needing simple attendance tracking, Event organizers running contactless entry, Coworking spaces or studios managing members, Growing communities wanting member profiles and reports	Front-desk / reception teams managing visitor check-in, School administrators tracking students and guardians, Volunteer program managers tracking onboarding and hours, Organizations needing real-time headcount and emergency alerts, Facilities wanting digitised visitor records and reporting
Comparison positioning	EntriScan is a lightweight, web-first QR check-in and membership platform positioned for community groups, schools, and events that want low-friction mobile check-in without hardware.	KeepnTrack positions itself as a campus- and volunteer-focused visitor management suite with built-in screening, badge printing and volunteer hours tracking, plus optional preconfigured hardware and cloud hosting.
Best-fit signals	Choose EntriScan when you need rapid deployment, low friction attendee experience (no app), and built-in member management for clubs, schools, or events.	Choose KeepnTrack when you need combined visitor and volunteer management with built-in background screening and badge printing (for example, schools and non-profits).

EntriScan

entriscan.com

Per-member QR codes and shareable profile pages for faster individual check-ins
medium confidence

View full profile

KeepnTrack

www.keepntrack.com

Emphasis on volunteer program features (applications, hours tracking) alongside visitor management
medium confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system