| Customer review sentiment | 4. 6/5 from 103 published reviews across 1 source | No review score listed |
|---|
| Visitor workflow depth | 7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals | 8 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals |
|---|
| Published feature breadth | 16 documented capabilities | 8 documented capabilities |
|---|
| Mobile and kiosk flexibility | iOS and Android; Optional kiosk | iOS and Android; Optional kiosk |
|---|
| Ongoing free access | Free trial published | Published ongoing free plan |
|---|
| Deployment and integrations | 7 published deployment and integration options | 11 published deployment and integration options |
|---|
| Industry coverage | 13 documented sectors | 10 documented sectors |
|---|
| Published evidence | 14 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured | 8 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured |
|---|
| Visitor management focus | 60% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals | 100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals |
|---|
| Access-control integrations | 1 access-control integration signal | 2 access-control integration signals |
|---|
| Pricing transparency | 8 published pricing plans | 4 published pricing plans |
|---|
| Best for | Centralised visitor and contractor sign-in for offices, Construction sites needing geofencing and contractor inductions, Healthcare and education sites requiring contact and evacuation records, Multi-site organisations requiring site-level reporting and multi-language kiosks, Organisations that require badge printing and host notifications, Teams that want integrations with project and directory systems, Event or facility managers who need capacity and evacuation tools, Organisations needing reusable digital passes and mobile check-in | Front-desk automation and reception replacement, Organizations needing watchlist screening and identity verification, Multi-site enterprises requiring centralised visitor policies, Regulated facilities requiring audit-ready visitor evidence, Events and light deployments via LogBook Lite |
|---|
| Comparison positioning | EVA Check-in is positioned as a per-site, safety-focused visitor and contractor management platform with published per-site pricing and modular add-ons for geofencing, bookings and API access. | LogBook360 is positioned as an AI-first, compliance-centric visitor management platform with explicit per-location pricing for enterprise buyers. |
|---|
| Best-fit signals | Choose EVA when you require per-site control with predictable per-site monthly pricing and add-ons, Choose EVA for construction or project sites that need geofencing and Procore syncing, Choose EVA for organisations prioritising evacuation reporting and multi-warden mustering | Choose LogBook360 when you need rapid, audit-ready visitor screening across multiple sites and clear per-site pricing., Choose LogBook360 for controlled facilities that require ITAR/EAR and contractor induction evidence. |
|---|
| Fit considerations | Budget comparisons should account for add-on and SMS bundle costs which are billed separately per site or per bundle, Enterprise or very large site counts may require custom pricing and multi-site onboarding fees | , Validate facial recognition consent and retention specifics in contracts and privacy policy. |
|---|
| Pricing information | Published prices are per site per month in multiple currencies; several optional add-ons have per-site or per-account monthly fees and prepaid SMS bundles. | Site lists a single published per-location price of $15,000/year (hardware included) and also advertises a free plan up to 150 visitor check-ins per month; volume/enterprise pricing available for 10+ sites. |
|---|