| Customer review sentiment | 4. 6/5 from 103 published reviews across 1 source | 4. 7/5 from 38 published reviews across 4 sources, with 86 stored feedback themes |
|---|
| Visitor workflow depth | 7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals | 7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals |
|---|
| Published feature breadth | 16 documented capabilities | 8 documented capabilities |
|---|
| Mobile and kiosk flexibility | iOS and Android; Optional kiosk | iOS and Android; Optional kiosk |
|---|
| Ongoing free access | Free trial published | Published ongoing free plan |
|---|
| Deployment and integrations | 7 published deployment and integration options | 10 published deployment and integration options |
|---|
| Industry coverage | 13 documented sectors | 11 documented sectors |
|---|
| Published evidence | 14 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured | 14 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured |
|---|
| Visitor management focus | 60% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals | 100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals |
|---|
| Access-control integrations | 1 access-control integration signal | 3 access-control integration signals |
|---|
| Pricing transparency | 8 published pricing plans | 2 published pricing plans |
|---|
| Best for | Centralised visitor and contractor sign-in for offices, Construction sites needing geofencing and contractor inductions, Healthcare and education sites requiring contact and evacuation records, Multi-site organisations requiring site-level reporting and multi-language kiosks, Organisations that require badge printing and host notifications, Teams that want integrations with project and directory systems, Event or facility managers who need capacity and evacuation tools, Organisations needing reusable digital passes and mobile check-in | Reception and front-desk automation, Enterprises requiring PIAM and unified badging, Data centers and secure facilities, Healthcare sites (hospitals), Multi-tenant property managers |
|---|
| Comparison positioning | EVA Check-in is positioned as a per-site, safety-focused visitor and contractor management platform with published per-site pricing and modular add-ons for geofencing, bookings and API access. | Splan positions itself as an integrated enterprise PIAM + Visitor Management platform with strong integration breadth and AI security tooling. |
|---|
| Best-fit signals | Choose EVA when you require per-site control with predictable per-site monthly pricing and add-ons, Choose EVA for construction or project sites that need geofencing and Procore syncing, Choose EVA for organisations prioritising evacuation reporting and multi-warden mustering | Choose Splan when you need unified physical/digital identity governance across many sites and deep PACS/IAM integrations., Choose Splan when you plan to use AI-driven analytics and natural-language operational controls. |
|---|
| Pricing information | Published prices are per site per month in multiple currencies; several optional add-ons have per-site or per-account monthly fees and prepaid SMS bundles. | Site lists a "Get Started for Free" prompt on the product page but does not publish standard pricing tiers; contact sales or demo for pricing details. |
|---|