Visitor management system comparison

friendlyway vs LoopSafe

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

friendlyway has published signals around Combined kiosk hardware and software from one vendor for large multi-site rollouts, Good fit for manufacturing, public sector and organisations that require evacuation mustering and robust badge/ID workflows, and Bundled hardware and software product line with dedicated kiosk models and display bundles. LoopSafe has published signals around Patented contactless face ID with stated privacy safeguards (no images stored), TGA‑approved embedded temperature sensor (ARTG ID 376450) as part of the kiosk offering, and Organisations needing automated visitor, staff and contractor sign-in (for example reception-less sites). Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

friendlyway

LoopSafe

CriteriafriendlywayLoopSafe

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.

friendlywayNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured

LoopSafeNo public scoreNo review score listedNo public review count captured

Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.

friendlyway81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafe81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

friendlyway69/10016 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafe31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. LoopSafe has the stronger published signal here.

friendlyway46/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafe90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

friendlyway38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafeNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

friendlyway58/10013 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafe28/1007 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit.

friendlyway93/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafe93/10014 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. LoopSafe has the stronger published signal here.

friendlyway47/1008 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured8 source pages analysed

LoopSafe68/10017 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured17 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

friendlyway93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafe73/10080% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems. friendlyway has the stronger published signal here.

friendlyway60/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafe26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

friendlywayNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafeNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.

friendlyway93/1007 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

LoopSafeNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose friendlyway when

Combined kiosk hardware and software from one vendor for large multi-site rollouts.
Good fit for manufacturing, public sector and organisations that require evacuation mustering and robust badge/ID workflows.
Bundled hardware and software product line with dedicated kiosk models and display bundles.
Published per-display digital-signage pricing and per-device add-on fees for predictable signage budgeting.
Organisations needing integrated kiosks + signage + visitor check-in

Choose LoopSafe when

Patented contactless face ID with stated privacy safeguards (no images stored)
TGA‑approved embedded temperature sensor (ARTG ID 376450) as part of the kiosk offering
LoopSafe publishes security & compliance in security & compliance.
LoopSafe publishes evacuation & safety in evacuation & safety.
LoopSafe publishes visitor journey in visitor journey.

friendlyway fit considerations

Mobile platform support (native iOS/Android apps) is not detailed on product pages and may require confirmation if mobile check-in is required.
Total cost of ownership when buying vendor kiosks vs using third-party devices
Depth of access-control and PIAM integrations required for secure sites
Emergency mustering and compliance reporting capabilities for regulated industries
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?

LoopSafe fit considerations

Assess total cost of ownership: kiosk hardware, per-site rollout, licences and integration/customisation effort
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
How well does LoopSafe match your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?

Metric	friendlyway	LoopSafe
Customer review sentiment	No review score listed	No review score listed
Visitor workflow depth	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals	7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth	16 documented capabilities	8 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations	13 published deployment and integration options	7 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	13 documented sectors	14 documented sectors
Published evidence	8 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured	17 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	2 access-control integration signals	1 access-control integration signal
Best for	Front desk automation and reception modernization, Facilities with multi-site rollouts that need central device control, Manufacturing plants requiring PPE and guided-visit workflows, Organizations needing integrated digital signage and wayfinding	Organisations needing automated visitor, staff and contractor sign-in (for example reception-less sites) — Aged care providers seeking integrated staff clock-on and visitor screening — Schools requiring student attendance sync with SMS (Student Management Systems) — Enterprises wanting access-control integration and workforce data sync — Organisations that require contractor compliance and document validation before site entry
Comparison positioning	friendlyway positions itself as an integrated vendor of cloud software and German-made kiosk hardware for enterprise visitor management and digital signage.	LoopSafe is positioned as an Australian, sector-focused entry-management system combining on-site kiosks and cloud management for organisations with a high duty of care.
Pricing information	A 14-day free trial is available.	Pricing includes emperature checking device The Therapeutic Goods Association recently fined two companies $25,200 for unlawfully advertising thermometers to meet.....

friendlyway

www.friendlyway.com

Bundled hardware and software product line with dedicated kiosk models and display bundles.
Total cost of ownership when buying vendor kiosks vs using third-party devices
high confidence

View full profile

LoopSafe

loopsafe.net

Patented contactless face ID with stated privacy safeguards (no images stored)
high confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system