Visitor management system comparison

Greetly vs ProVisit

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Greetly has published signals around Branded badge printing, digital NDA capture at check-in, and integrations with workplace directories and messaging tools, Explicit SOC 2 and GDPR compliance statements combined with digital NDA capture and on-site badge printing, and Directory sync with Azure AD/Google Workspace plus multiple host notification channels. ProVisit has published signals around Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements, Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages, and Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Choose Greetly when

Branded badge printing, digital NDA capture at check-in, and integrations with workplace directories and messaging tools.
Explicit SOC 2 and GDPR compliance statements combined with digital NDA capture and on-site badge printing
Directory sync with Azure AD/Google Workspace plus multiple host notification channels
Reception teams, facilities and enterprises needing branded check-ins, digital NDAs, and integration with workplace directories and comms
Greetly publishes emergency evacuation in security & compliance.

Choose ProVisit when

Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements
Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting
Mid-to-large organisations needing contractor onboarding, multi-site visibility and compliance audit trails
ProVisit publishes sign-in control & approvals in security & compliance.

Greetly fit considerations

Hosting region, detailed SLA/pricing tiers and explicit HIPAA support are not provided on product pages; HIPAA is explicitly not supported for PHI.
Validate SLA, uptime and enterprise deployment services for large multi-site rollouts
Compare badge printing hardware compatibility and kiosk provisioning processes
Assess depth of contractor/induction workflows if you need detailed contractor compliance
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

ProVisit fit considerations

No public pricing tiers — procurement requires a tailored quote
Hosting region and specific mobile platform support are not specified on public pages
Assess kiosk hardware options and integration with existing access control
Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

Metric	Greetly	ProVisit
Recommended score	93/100	90/100
Hardware flexibility	Optional kiosk	Optional kiosk
Visitor workflow depth	0 specialised workflow signals	0 specialised workflow signals
Customer review sentiment	4. 8/5 from 104 published reviews	No review score listed
Evidence confidence	high	medium
Published evidence	24 vendor pages analysed	19 vendor pages analysed
Best for	Organizations replacing manual visitor sign-in, Multi-site workplaces needing centralized visitor visibility, Facilities managing visitors, contractors, and deliveries, Schools seeking visitor screening, badges, and staff notifications, Manufacturing sites requiring audit-ready visitor logs, Organizations needing digital NDAs, waivers, or safety forms, Reception automation and front-desk replacement, Organizations needing digital NDA/wavier capture at sign-in, Teams that require host notifications via workplace apps, Multi-site or multilingual enterprises seeking scalable visitor logs, Facilities that want touchless QR-based or kiosk tablet check-ins	Buyer seeking paperless visitor/contractor sign-in and audit trails, Organisations needing contractor onboarding and permit workflows, Multi-site operators wanting central visibility of who’s on site, Teams requiring fast contactless arrivals (QR codes) and badge printing, Organisations that want mobile evacuation/roll-call capability
Comparison positioning	Greetly positions itself as a cloud-first, enterprise-capable visitor management system emphasizing touchless check-in, badge printing, digital agreements and integrations with workplace directories and messaging.	ProVisit positions itself as a compliance-first UK visitor and contractor management platform with kiosk, QR and contractor onboarding features and tailored pricing.
Best-fit signals	Choose Greetly when you need branded badge printing, digital NDA capture at check-in, and integrations with workplace directories and messaging tools.	Choose ProVisit when contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements
Pricing information	The vendor states there are no extra charges or hidden fees. Public pricing is shown monthly with annual billing.	Website states pricing is tailored to requirements and that ProVisit will prepare a no-obligation quote; no fixed public plans are shown (.

Greetly

www.greetly.com/features/visitor-management-system

Explicit SOC 2 and GDPR compliance statements combined with digital NDA capture and on-site badge printing
high confidence

View full profile

ProVisit

www.provisit.co.uk

Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
medium confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system