Visitor Management DirectoryVisitor management system comparison
A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.
Comparison summary
Side-by-side comparison of Greetly and Teamgo focused on buyer fit and operational differences relevant to visitor management procurement decisions.
Pair analysis confidence: medium
Criteria scores
Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.
This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.
| Factor | Greetly | Teamgo | Buyer meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer fit (primary use cases) | Positions toward enterprises that need branded badges, digital NDAs/waivers, and integrations with workplace directories and messaging. | Positions toward multi-location organisations needing kiosk + mobile app workflows, geofencing attendance, and contractor compliance/induction features. | Choose Greetly when branded badge printing and digital agreement capture are central. Choose Teamgo when mobile app sign-ins, geofencing for staff, or built-in contractor induction/expiry workflows are required. |
| Deployment & hosting | Cloud-first guided setup; regional hosting/residency options not published. | Cloud hosting on AWS with stated regional hosting options (Australia, UK, US). | If you require explicit regional hosting choices for compliance, Teamgo surfaces regions; Greetly does not publish residency options. |
| Hardware & kiosk support | Supports self-service kiosks and optional tablet kiosks; badge printing supported (vendor lists badge printing as capability). | Provides free iPad and Android kiosk apps, offline kiosk sync and mentions specific badge printer compatibility in guidance. | For offline kiosk resilience and documented kiosk apps/compatibility, Teamgo provides clearer kiosk-app/offline signals; Greetly supports kiosks but has less published detail on offline behavior. |
| Visitor journey and check-in methods | Touchless QR, tablet kiosks, pre-registration, group check-ins, multilingual check-ins and branded flows; emphasis on digital forms/signatures at check-in. | iPad/Android kiosks, QR code posters, Teamgo Pass mobile app, geofenced automatic check-in/out and health screening workflows. | Teamgo adds geofencing and a dedicated mobile pass app for remote staff; Greetly emphasizes branded, multilingual check-in and digital document capture at the point of entry. |
| Contractor management | Mentions contractor and delivery tracking; supports custom workflows and digital NDA/waiver capture. | Provides contractor compliance workflows with document requests, inductions, expiry monitoring and contractor-specific workflows. | If you need automated inductions, expiry monitoring and contractor compliance lifecycle features out of the box, Teamgo indicates deeper contractor management signals. |
| Evacuation & emergency roll-call | Provides emergency evacuation tracking and searchable, exportable logs for roll-call/reporting. | Includes emergency activation, evacuation mode and real-time evacuation/attendee lists and alerts. | Both vendors support evacuation lists; Teamgo emphasizes real-time activation/alerts and evacuation mode, which may be useful for active roll-call processes. |
| Access control integration potential | Directory sync with Azure AD and Google Workspace plus host notifications; one access-control integration signal published. | Mentions Azure/Active Directory integration and badges; published integrations list but SCIM/API depth not fully detailed. | Greetly explicitly lists directory sync and multiple host-notification channels; Teamgo lists similar integrations but buyers should validate connector depth (SCIM, API, calendar and third-party access-control bindings). |
| Pricing posture and transparency | Two public yearly-billed plans (Essential, Pro) with vendor statement about no hidden fees; pricing shown as monthly with annual billing. | Multiple published monthly tiers (Essential $29, Advance $99, Complete $199) with 30-day free trial and enterprise quoting. | Teamgo shows more granular public tiers and a free trial; Greetly publishes two plans billed yearly—compare feature inclusion per tier for cost/feature fit. |
| Metric | Greetly | Teamgo |
|---|---|---|
| Customer review sentiment | 4. 9/5 from 208 published reviews across 6 sources, with 176 stored feedback themes | 4. 4/5 from 83 published reviews across 4 sources, with 133 stored feedback themes |
| Visitor and contractor workflows | 6 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals | 5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals |
| Evacuation management | 2 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals | 2 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals |
| Advanced reporting | 3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals | 3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals |
| Published feature breadth | 16 documented capabilities | 12 documented capabilities |
| Deployment and integrations | 13 published deployment and integration options | 8 published deployment and integration options |
| Industry coverage | 12 documented sectors | 13 documented sectors |
| Published evidence | 24 vendor pages analysed, 6 review sources captured | 24 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured |
| Visitor management focus | 80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals | 100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals |
| Access-control integrations | No access-control integration evidence captured | No access-control integration evidence captured |
| Pricing transparency | Pricing page published | 4 published pricing plans |
| Best for | Workplace teams replacing paper or clipboard sign-ins, Multi-site organizations needing centralized visitor visibility, Facilities teams managing visitors, deliveries, and host alerts, Organizations requiring digital NDAs, waivers, or safety forms, Workplaces seeking touchless smartphone check-in, Teams needing searchable, exportable visitor records, Organizations using Slack, Teams, Google Workspace, or Azure AD, Facilities requiring branded visitor badges | Workplaces replacing paper sign-in with automated visitor, employee and contractor check-in, Organisations needing configurable visitor inductions, document collection and compliance records, Multi-site teams using iPad, Android, QR-code or mobile check-in, Construction, logistics and field-work organisations needing contractor or geofenced attendance visibility, Schools, charities and not-for-profits seeking self-service check-in and emergency communications, Security-conscious workplaces requiring screening, watch lists, deny lists and capacity alerts |
| Comparison positioning | Greetly compares as a broad, cloud-based visitor-management platform combining touchless arrival, digital documents, badges, notifications, reporting, and workplace-system connectivity. | Teamgo compares as a broad, workflow-oriented visitor platform combining visitor, employee, contractor, kiosk, QR-code and geofencing use cases with published tier pricing. |
| Best-fit signals | Choose Greetly when rapid, touchless check-in is central to the visitor experience., Choose it when visitor records, badges, forms, and host alerts should be managed together., Choose it when the organization already uses Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Teams, or the listed connectivity options. | Choose Teamgo when one platform must cover visitors, employees and contractors., Choose it when multiple check-in modes are useful across offices, sites or mobile teams., Choose it when configurable compliance workflows and exportable reporting matter. |
| Fit considerations | Healthcare use cases involving PHI conflict with the product's explicit HIPAA limitation., Organizations should align the product's visitor and notification workflows with their emergency and access procedures., The supplied evidence emphasizes visitor management rather than native mobile apps or a specific access-control platform. | The product spans many modules, so plan selection and workflow design should be part of the evaluation., Kiosk-led deployments may require operational decisions about BYO devices, mounting and printers:, Geofencing introduces mobile-app and location-permission dependencies: |
www.greetly.com/features/visitor-management-system
www.teamgo.co
Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.
Compare another pair
Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.