Visitor management system comparison

Greetly vs VisitUs

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Greetly and VisitUs are cloud visitor management systems with overlapping core capabilities (tablet/QR check-in, badge printing option, directory and Teams integrations). Key differences affect buyer fit around evacuation, free access/pricing posture, regional hosting and compliance describes, contractor/induction depth, identity/ID capture, and published evidence detail.

Last checked: 1 Sept 2026
Sources: 40
Evidence confidence: Medium

Pair analysis confidence: high

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

Greetly

VisitUs

CriteriaGreetlyVisitUs

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.

100

Greetly100/1004. 9/5 from 208 published reviews across 6 sources, with 176 stored feedback themes208 reviews across review sources

VisitUs95/1004. 7/5 from 267 published reviews across 7 sources, with 153 stored feedback themes267 reviews across review sources

Visitor and contractor workflowsVisitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflows.

100

Greetly100/1006 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs98/1006 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Evacuation managementEvacuation, emergency, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, and who-is-on-site workflows. VisitUs has the stronger published signal here.

Greetly67/1002 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

VisitUs100/1003 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Advanced reportingReporting, analytics, dashboards, audit logs, exports, visitor history, and compliance reporting.

100

Greetly100/1003 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs96/1003 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. VisitUs has the stronger published signal here.

Greetly76/10016 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs94/10021 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. VisitUs has the stronger published signal here.

Greetly53/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs96/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

GreetlyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs82/100Published ongoing free planPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. VisitUs has the stronger published signal here.

Greetly65/10013 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs91/10020 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. Greetly has the stronger published signal here.

100

Greetly100/10012 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs88/10011 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory.

100

Greetly100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 6 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

VisitUs95/10016 vendor pages analysed, 7 review sources captured16 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. VisitUs has the stronger published signal here.

Greetly80/10080% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs97/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.

GreetlyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs89/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

GreetlyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs92/100Australia, US, EUPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. VisitUs has the stronger published signal here.

Greetly75/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

VisitUs84/1003 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Key differences

Factor	Greetly	VisitUs	Buyer meaning
Free / trial access	No ongoing free-forever tier published; public pricing shows paid Essential and Pro yearly plans.	Publishes a free-forever Core plan (no credit card) and 7-day trials for premium modules; paid plans are location-based but not fully tiered publicly.	VisitUs reduces evaluation friction and pilot cost with a genuine free plan and short trials; Greetly requires engaging a paid plan for production testing or relies on vendor sales for trials.
Regional hosting / data residency	No regional hosting options published on product pages; regional hosting not specified.	Publishes selectable hosting regions (Australia, US, EU described) and references ISO/IEC 27001 alignment for some offerings.	Buyers with strict data residency requirements are more likely to find VisitUs’ stated regional hosting relevant; Greetly buyers should treat data residency as an open procurement question.
Security & compliance signals	Explicit SOC 2 and GDPR compliance statements; explicitly disclaims HIPAA/PHI use.	describes ISO/IEC 27001 alignment and describes encryption practices; public level described as alignment rather than a directly published certificate in product pages.	Greetly presents strong SOC 2/GDPR describes useful for EU/US privacy expectations; VisitUs highlights ISO-style alignment and encryption details that may suit buyers prioritising ISO controls—ask for certification scope and artefacts to compare equivalently.
Evacuation and emergency workflows	Provides emergency evacuation tracking and visitor lists; evacuation support not detailed in comparisonEvidence fields.	Publishes mobile roll calls, 'I am safe' confirmations, SMS alerts and time-stamped evacuation reports with live dashboards.	VisitUs advertises more explicit evacuation-first features, which is likely better for organisations where roll-call and emergency communications are mission-critical.
Contractor management and inductions	Supports contractor tracking and digital NDAs/waivers; flagged as useful but detailed contractor induction workflow depth not published.	Public pages include contractor sign-in, induction workflows, safety videos, and configurable compliance steps.	VisitUs appears to publish more structured contractor/induction capabilities; Greetly supports contractor tracking but buyers needing rich induction processes should probe Greetly’s workflow configurability and reporting for contractors.
Identity verification and ID capture	No published facial recognition or explicit ID-capture capabilities; visitor photo capture and timestamps included in logs.	Publishes visitor/contractor sign-in records plus facial recognition and photo/ID capture capabilities.	If photo capture or facial/ID verification is required, VisitUs documents those signals; Greetly provides photos for logs but does not advertise facial recognition or ID capture publicly.
Integrations and developer access	Integrations with Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Teams, Google Chat, email, SMS, voice calls, API and Zapier are published; directory sync highlighted.	Publishes REST API, real-time webhooks, SSO and directory integration including Active Directory/Entra ID and Teams.	Both support directory sync and host notifications; VisitUs emphasizes API/webhooks and modular integrations useful for automation-heavy environments while Greetly emphasizes standard SaaS integrations and directory sync for workspace tools.
Pricing posture and transparency	Shows two public paid plans (Essential, Pro) billed yearly and states 'no extra charges' on site; pricing approach detail per-location/modules not emphasised.	Declares a modular, location-based pricing approach with free core tier; public pages do not list full paid tiers or per-module costs but focus on per-location licensing.	VisitUs’ modular/location model may be more cost-flexible for multi-site deployments but requires a pricing conversation; Greetly publishes two paid tiers that may simplify budgeting if features align.

Choose Greetly when

SOC 2 and GDPR-aligned vendor statements and prefer publicly documented paid plan tiers for budgeting.
Your primary needs are directory sync (Azure AD/Google Workspace) plus host notifications via workplace chat tools with badge printing and NDA/waiver capture at check-in.
Rapid, touchless check-in is central to the visitor experience.
Visitor records, badges, forms, and host alerts should be managed together.
The organization already uses Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Teams, or the listed connectivity options.

Choose VisitUs when

Clear evacuation-first features (mobile roll-call, 'I am safe' confirmations) and multi-region hosting options.
A free-forever plan to pilot at low cost or prefer a modular, location-based pricing approach for multi-site rollouts, and need facial/photo ID capture or contractor induction modules.
Strong evacuation workflows plus a low-friction free trial to validate operations.
Pre-registration, multi-site reporting and Teams/AD integration.
Ongoing free forever plan combined with evacuation-first feature set

Greetly fit considerations

Healthcare use cases involving PHI conflict with the product's explicit HIPAA limitation.
Organizations should align the product's visitor and notification workflows with their emergency and access procedures.
The supplied evidence emphasizes visitor management rather than native mobile apps or a specific access-control platform.
Healthcare workflows involving PHI are a poor fit because the supplied NDA page explicitly excludes HIPAA compliance and PHI storage.
Organizations with complex emergency or access-control processes should evaluate how Greetly fits those operating procedures.

VisitUs fit considerations

Badge/label layout and field customization limits
Limited integrations
Reception check-in is primarily designed around tablet
Advanced configuration can be restrictive for complex requirements
Compare per-location pricing and module add-on costs vs alternatives

What appears similar

Both vendors support cloud-based tablet and QR/touchless check-ins, optional kiosk hardware, integration with Microsoft Teams for host notifications, and mobile iOS/Android coverage — buyers should evaluate host-notification latency and mobile app experience during pilots.
Both present multi-site reporting and exportable, time-stamped visitor logs suitable for audits, but VisitUs highlights evacuation reports explicitly.

Fit questions

Which system better matches your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?
Which platform fits your current workplace, identity, messaging, and access-control stack?
Which rollout path is easiest for your locations, support model, and budget?

Metric	Greetly	VisitUs
Customer review sentiment	4. 9/5 from 208 published reviews across 6 sources, with 176 stored feedback themes	4. 7/5 from 267 published reviews across 7 sources, with 153 stored feedback themes
Visitor and contractor workflows	6 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals	6 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals
Evacuation management	2 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals	3 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals
Advanced reporting	3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals	3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals
Published feature breadth	16 documented capabilities	21 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations	13 published deployment and integration options	20 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	12 documented sectors	11 documented sectors
Published evidence	24 vendor pages analysed, 6 review sources captured	16 vendor pages analysed, 7 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	No access-control integration evidence captured	1 access-control integration signal
Pricing transparency	Pricing page published	3 published pricing plans
Best for	Workplace teams replacing paper or clipboard sign-ins, Multi-site organizations needing centralized visitor visibility, Facilities teams managing visitors, deliveries, and host alerts, Organizations requiring digital NDAs, waivers, or safety forms, Workplaces seeking touchless smartphone check-in, Teams needing searchable, exportable visitor records, Organizations using Slack, Teams, Google Workspace, or Azure AD, Facilities requiring branded visitor badges	Organisations needing digital visitor, contractor and staff sign-in, Multi-location teams requiring live occupancy and evacuation visibility, Workplaces needing pre-registration, inductions and compliance records, Reception automation and front-desk efficiency, Organisations needing evacuation & roll-call capabilities, Multi-site enterprises requiring centralised visitor logs, Contractor induction and compliance tracking, Teams that want integrations with corporate directories and messaging
Comparison positioning	Greetly compares as a broad, cloud-based visitor-management platform combining touchless arrival, digital documents, badges, notifications, reporting, and workplace-system connectivity.	VisitUs positions as a cloud-first, feature-rich visitor management solution with emphasis on evacuation, pre-registration and multi-region hosting options.
Best-fit signals	Choose Greetly when rapid, touchless check-in is central to the visitor experience., Choose it when visitor records, badges, forms, and host alerts should be managed together., Choose it when the organization already uses Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Teams, or the listed connectivity options.	Choose VisitUs when you need strong evacuation workflows plus a low-friction free trial to validate operations., Choose when you require pre-registration, multi-site reporting and Teams/AD integration.

SourcesVisitor management Touchless check-in Pre-registration Visitor badges

SourcesOverview evacuation Visitor sign-in app integrations ISO and encryption Free plan

Greetly

www.greetly.com/features/visitor-management-system

Smartphone check-in without an app download.
Breadth of visitor journey coverage
high confidence

View full profile

VisitUs

visit-us.com

Ongoing free forever plan combined with evacuation-first feature set
medium confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system