Visitor Management SystemsVisitor management system comparison
A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.
Comparison summary
LogBook360 has published signals around Rapid, audit-ready visitor screening across multiple sites and clear per-site pricing, Choose LogBook360 for controlled facilities that require ITAR/EAR and contractor induction evidence, and ALBi AI engine for real-time screening and identity verification. SwipedOn has published signals around An all-in-one workplace platform combining visitor management, desk/room booking and safety features, Multi-site governance and directory/calendar integrations are important, and Evacuation readiness, audit trails and identity checks are operational priorities. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.
Criteria scores
Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.
This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.
| Metric | LogBook360 | SwipedOn |
|---|---|---|
| Customer review sentiment | No review score listed | 4. 7/5 from 492 published reviews across 6 sources, with 62 stored feedback themes |
| Visitor workflow depth | 8 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals | 8 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals |
| Published feature breadth | 8 documented capabilities | 40 documented capabilities |
| Mobile and kiosk flexibility | iOS and Android; Optional kiosk | iOS and Android; Optional kiosk |
| Ongoing free access | Published ongoing free plan | Free trial published |
| Deployment and integrations | 11 published deployment and integration options | 33 published deployment and integration options |
| Industry coverage | 10 documented sectors | 13 documented sectors |
| Published evidence | 8 vendor pages analysed, 0 review sources captured | 24 vendor pages analysed, 6 review sources captured |
| Visitor management focus | 100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals | 100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals |
| Access-control integrations | 2 access-control integration signals | 2 access-control integration signals |
| Regional hosting | Regional hosting signal published | Regional hosting signal published |
| Pricing transparency | 4 published pricing plans | 4 published pricing plans |
| Best for | Front-desk automation and reception replacement, Organizations needing watchlist screening and identity verification, Multi-site enterprises requiring centralised visitor policies, Regulated facilities requiring audit-ready visitor evidence, Events and light deployments via LogBook Lite | Organizations needing digital visitor sign-in and emergency evacuation lists, Multi-site workplaces managing visitors, employees and resources centrally, Hybrid workplaces booking desks, rooms and other resources, Schools and public-sector sites requiring visitor preparation and safeguarding workflows, Mailrooms and reception teams needing delivery tracking and recipient notifications, Reception automation and front-desk reduction, Multi-site organisations needing centralised visitor & employee presence, Education providers requiring safeguarding and MIS/SIS connectivity, Healthcare and regulated workplaces needing ID checks and audit trails, Facilities teams tracking desk/room utilisation for hybrid working, Security & compliance teams needing watchlists and visitor screening, Organisations managing contractor onboarding and credentialing, Operations teams running high-volume appointments and events, Reception automation and visitor experience improvement, Multi-site organisations needing central oversight, Highly regulated sites needing pre-visit screening and audit trails, Organisations adopting hybrid work that need desk and room booking, Facilities and security teams requiring evacuation-ready headcounts, Teams needing badge printing and physical on-site credentialing, Operations seeking integrations to HR, calendar and access control, Organisations wanting branded, multilingual sign-in touchpoints |
| Comparison positioning | LogBook360 is positioned as an AI-first, compliance-centric visitor management platform with explicit per-location pricing for enterprise buyers. | Sign In App (SwipedOn) positions as an integrated workplace platform that spans visitor management, employee sign-in, space booking and safety with enterprise integration capabilities. |
| Best-fit signals | Choose LogBook360 when you need rapid, audit-ready visitor screening across multiple sites and clear per-site pricing., Choose LogBook360 for controlled facilities that require ITAR/EAR and contractor induction evidence. | Choose this product when you need an all-in-one workplace platform combining visitor management, desk/room booking and safety features, Choose this product when multi-site governance and directory/calendar integrations are important, Choose this product when evacuation readiness, audit trails and identity checks are operational priorities |
| Pricing information | Site lists a single published per-location price of $15,000/year (hardware included) and also advertises a free plan up to 150 visitor check-ins per month; volume/enterprise pricing available for 10+ sites. | Public pricing lists Core, Enhanced and Pro per-site annual subscriptions (AUD examples) and itemised add-ons (Spaces, Scheduling, Time & Attendance, hardware and Tap reader). A free trial is offered. |
logbook360.com
signinapp.com/swipedon-homepage
Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.
Compare another pair
Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.