Visitor Management SystemsVisitor management system comparison
A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.
Comparison summary
LogBook360 has published signals around Rapid, audit-ready visitor screening across multiple sites and clear per-site pricing, Choose LogBook360 for controlled facilities that require ITAR/EAR and contractor induction evidence, and ALBi AI engine for real-time screening and identity verification. Teamgo has published signals around A multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff, Unlimited kiosks and users per account as stated on product pages, and Geofencing attendance for automatic check-in/out of mobile staff. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.
| Metric | LogBook360 | Teamgo |
|---|---|---|
| Recommended score | 93/100 | 93/100 |
| Ongoing free access | Published ongoing free plan | Free trial published |
| Mobile platform coverage | iOS and Android | iOS and Android |
| Hardware flexibility | Optional kiosk | Optional kiosk |
| Visitor workflow depth | 0 specialised workflow signals | 4 specialised workflow signals |
| Flexible, modular pricing | Fixed tiers | Fixed tiers |
| Customer review sentiment | No review score listed | 4. 4/5 from 83 published reviews |
| Evidence confidence | medium | medium |
| Published evidence | 8 vendor pages analysed | 24 vendor pages analysed |
| Best for | Front-desk automation and reception replacement, Organizations needing watchlist screening and identity verification, Multi-site enterprises requiring centralised visitor policies, Regulated facilities requiring audit-ready visitor evidence, Events and light deployments via LogBook Lite | Organisations replacing paper visitor books with digital check-in, Multi-location workplaces needing centralised visitor and employee records, Schools and care facilities managing visitors, staff, health screening and emergencies, Construction and logistics sites managing contractors and attendance, Organisations requiring custom visitor workflows, documents and compliance records, Reception-lite workplaces replacing paper sign-in, Organisations needing contactless/QR check-in, Sites requiring pre-registration and inductions, Multi-site enterprises wanting central dashboard, Teams needing geofenced staff attendance, Front-desk visitor sign-in and reception automation, Teams requiring contractor induction and document collection, Sites needing emergency evacuation roll-call and alerts, Distributed workplaces wanting geofencing attendance for mobile staff |
| Comparison positioning | LogBook360 is positioned as an AI-first, compliance-centric visitor management platform with explicit per-location pricing for enterprise buyers. | Teamgo positions itself as a cloud-first, kiosk- and mobile-centric visitor management system suitable for small sites to global enterprises with a focus on contactless workflows and geofencing attendance. |
| Best-fit signals | Choose LogBook360 when you need rapid, audit-ready visitor screening across multiple sites and clear per-site pricing., Choose LogBook360 for controlled facilities that require ITAR/EAR and contractor induction evidence. | Choose Teamgo when you need a multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff. |
| Pricing information | Site lists a single published per-location price of $15,000/year (hardware included) and also advertises a free plan up to 150 visitor check-ins per month; volume/enterprise pricing available for 10+ sites. | Publicly listed monthly plan prices shown on homepage; enterprise and add-on pricing available via sales. |
logbook360.com
www.teamgo.co
Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.
Compare another pair
Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.