Visitor management system comparison

MyLobby vs Paxton

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. Paxton has published signals around Integrated access control with video management and have access to certified installers, Paxton10’s combined access + VMS platform with support for up to 1000 third‑party IP cameras, and Solo positioned as phone‑based, cloud‑hosted solution for smartphone credential use. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

51
MyLobby
41
Paxton
CriteriaMyLobbyPaxton
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
69
MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources
49
Paxton49/1002. 9/5 from 10 published reviews across 1 source, with 27 stored feedback themes10 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
81
MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
31
Paxton31/1003 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
Paxton31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. Paxton has the stronger published signal here.
78
MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
90
Paxton90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
38
MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
PaxtonNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
NE
MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
43
Paxton43/10010 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. Paxton has the stronger published signal here.
37
MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
60
Paxton60/1006 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
58
MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed
41
Paxton41/1008 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured8 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
93
MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
53
Paxton53/10060% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
60
Paxton60/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
PaxtonNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.
68
MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
PaxtonNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose MyLobby when

  • Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
  • Contractor management

Choose Paxton when

  • Integrated access control with video management and have access to certified installers.
  • Paxton10’s combined access + VMS platform with support for up to 1000 third‑party IP cameras
  • Solo positioned as phone‑based, cloud‑hosted solution for smartphone credential use
  • Organisations needing combined access control and video management
  • Sites requiring scalable multi‑door deployments managed by certified installers

MyLobby fit considerations

  • Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
  • Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
  • Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?

Paxton fit considerations

  • Equipment reliability problems (controllers, readers, entry units, intercoms)
  • Unstable software and intercom experiences
  • Delayed or ineffective complaint and warranty handling
  • Repeated equipment failures and unresolved support cases
  • Unreliable system and mobile notifications
MetricMyLobbyPaxton
Customer review sentiment4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source2. 9/5 from 10 published reviews across 1 source, with 27 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals3 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityiOS and Android; Optional kioskiOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Deployment and integrations0 published deployment and integration options10 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage4 documented sectors6 documented sectors
Published evidence12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured8 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals60% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrationsNo access-control integration evidence captured2 access-control integration signals
Comparison positioningCompare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.Paxton offers hardware‑centric access control systems with an integrated video management option (Paxton10) and a newer phone‑based cloud offering (Solo), sold primarily through certified installers.
Best-fit signalsConsider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.Choose Paxton when you need integrated access control with video management and have access to certified installers.
Pricing informationPricing includes se Study Contact Us Support New Features MyLobby Visitor Management Pricing Packages Lite $45 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial QR...; een with the company logo Email Notification Ability to send notification via email Basic $85 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; compliance in the facility while also substantially speeding up your workflows. Standard $179 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; lete the submission. This is a great way to ensure every entry is compliant. Professional $249 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Ma...Custom pricing or quote-based sales process

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

  • Contractor management
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • low confidence
View full profile

Paxton

www.paxton-access.com

  • Paxton10’s combined access + VMS platform with support for up to 1000 third‑party IP cameras
  • Depth of video management features and supported camera list
  • high confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system