Visitor management system comparison

MyLobby vs PULT

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. PULT has published signals around EU hosting/GDPR compliance and integrated workplace automation (desk/room/visitor) are priorities, Passive presence detection using existing Wi‑Fi to support evacuation and occupancy analytics, and Wi‑Fi/MDM passive presence detection without extra sensors. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

51
MyLobby
65
PULT
CriteriaMyLobbyPULT
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. PULT has the stronger published signal here.
69
MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources
87
PULT87/1004. 7/5 from 89 published reviews across 5 sources, with 64 stored feedback themes89 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
81
MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
68
PULT68/1006 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
PULT31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
78
MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
65
PULT65/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability. PULT has the stronger published signal here.
38
MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
73
PULT73/100Free access signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
NE
MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
43
PULT43/10010 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. PULT has the stronger published signal here.
37
MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
71
PULT71/1007 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. PULT has the stronger published signal here.
58
MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed
82
PULT82/10015 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured15 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. MyLobby has the stronger published signal here.
93
MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
73
PULT73/10080% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
PULTNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
63
PULT63/100Regional hosting signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. PULT has the stronger published signal here.
68
MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
93
PULT93/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose MyLobby when

  • Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
  • Contractor management

Choose PULT when

  • EU hosting/GDPR compliance and integrated workplace automation (desk/room/visitor) are priorities
  • Passive presence detection using existing Wi‑Fi to support evacuation and occupancy analytics
  • Wi‑Fi/MDM passive presence detection without extra sensors
  • Visitor kiosk + NDA signing + automatic badge printing + audit exports in one platform
  • EU hosting + ISO 27001 + GDPR emphasis for privacy-sensitive organisations

MyLobby fit considerations

  • Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
  • Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
  • Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?

PULT fit considerations

  • Limited customization options
  • Attendance and Wi‑Fi presence tracking can be unreliable
  • Some users want more guided onboarding for administrators
  • Slack integration can drop and require reconnection
  • Minor translation issues; initial setup could use more help text
MetricMyLobbyPULT
Customer review sentiment4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source4. 7/5 from 89 published reviews across 5 sources, with 64 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals6 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Ongoing free accessFree trial publishedFree access signal published
Deployment and integrations0 published deployment and integration options10 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage4 documented sectors7 documented sectors
Published evidence12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured15 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrationsNo access-control integration evidence capturedNo access-control integration evidence captured
Pricing transparencyPricing page published4 published pricing plans
Comparison positioningCompare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.PULT positions itself as an EU‑hosted, integrated workplace operations platform that combines visitor management with Wi‑Fi presence, AI agents and deep calendar/HRIS integrations.
Best-fit signalsConsider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.Choose PULT when EU hosting/GDPR compliance and integrated workplace automation (desk/room/visitor) are priorities — Choose PULT when you want passive presence detection using existing Wi‑Fi to support evacuation and occupancy analytics
Pricing informationPricing includes se Study Contact Us Support New Features MyLobby Visitor Management Pricing Packages Lite $45 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial QR...; een with the company logo Email Notification Ability to send notification via email Basic $85 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; compliance in the facility while also substantially speeding up your workflows. Standard $179 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; lete the submission. This is a great way to ensure every entry is compliant. Professional $249 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Ma...Starter free tier (up to 20 users) and paid per-user tiers listed; Business visitor management is priced from €99/location/month. Minimum and billing details documented on pricing page.

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

  • Contractor management
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • low confidence
View full profile

PULT

www.pult.com

  • Wi‑Fi/MDM passive presence detection without extra sensors
  • Data residency & compliance (EU hosting, GDPR, ISO 27001)
  • high confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system