Visitor management system comparison

MyLobby vs Splan

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. Splan has published signals around Unified physical/digital identity governance across many sites and deep PACS/IAM integrations, You plan to use AI-driven analytics and natural-language operational controls, and Agentic AI assistant (PacsGPT™) for natural‑language queries and action orchestration across PACS and VMS. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

51
MyLobby
74
Splan
CriteriaMyLobbySplan
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. Splan has the stronger published signal here.
69
MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources
83
Splan83/1004. 7/5 from 38 published reviews across 4 sources, with 86 stored feedback themes38 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
Splan81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
Splan31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. Splan has the stronger published signal here.
78
MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
90
Splan90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability. Splan has the stronger published signal here.
38
MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Splan93/100Published ongoing free planPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
NE
MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
43
Splan43/10010 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. Splan has the stronger published signal here.
37
MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Splan93/10011 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. Splan has the stronger published signal here.
58
MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed
74
Splan74/10014 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured14 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.
93
MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Splan93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Splan93/1003 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
SplanNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. Splan has the stronger published signal here.
68
MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Splan93/1002 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose MyLobby when

  • Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
  • Contractor management

Choose Splan when

  • Unified physical/digital identity governance across many sites and deep PACS/IAM integrations.
  • You plan to use AI-driven analytics and natural-language operational controls.
  • Agentic AI assistant (PacsGPT™) for natural‑language queries and action orchestration across PACS and VMS
  • Combined PIAM and Visitor Management for lifecycle-driven badge provisioning and deprovisioning
  • Large enterprises requiring unified physical and digital identity governance

MyLobby fit considerations

  • Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
  • Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
  • Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?

Splan fit considerations

  • Custom reporting can be time-consuming to configure / limited reporting customization
  • Some requests for more third-party integrations / limited integration options
  • Initial learning curve for certain features
  • Perceived feature restrictions and concerns about upgrade frequency
  • Occasional data/display inconsistencies across user devices
MetricMyLobbySplan
Customer review sentiment4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source4. 7/5 from 38 published reviews across 4 sources, with 86 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityiOS and Android; Optional kioskiOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Ongoing free accessFree trial publishedPublished ongoing free plan
Deployment and integrations0 published deployment and integration options10 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage4 documented sectors11 documented sectors
Published evidence12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured14 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrationsNo access-control integration evidence captured3 access-control integration signals
Pricing transparencyPricing page published2 published pricing plans
Comparison positioningCompare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.Splan positions itself as an integrated enterprise PIAM + Visitor Management platform with strong integration breadth and AI security tooling.
Best-fit signalsConsider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.Choose Splan when you need unified physical/digital identity governance across many sites and deep PACS/IAM integrations., Choose Splan when you plan to use AI-driven analytics and natural-language operational controls.
Pricing informationPricing includes se Study Contact Us Support New Features MyLobby Visitor Management Pricing Packages Lite $45 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial QR...; een with the company logo Email Notification Ability to send notification via email Basic $85 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; compliance in the facility while also substantially speeding up your workflows. Standard $179 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; lete the submission. This is a great way to ensure every entry is compliant. Professional $249 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Ma...Site lists a "Get Started for Free" prompt on the product page but does not publish standard pricing tiers; contact sales or demo for pricing details.

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

  • Contractor management
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • low confidence
View full profile

Splan

www.splan.com

  • Agentic AI assistant (PacsGPT™) for natural‑language queries and action orchestration across PACS and VMS
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system