Visitor management system comparison

MyLobby vs Visitly

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

MyLobby has published signals around Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion, Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion, and Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion. Visitly has published signals around Procurement requires SOC 2 / ISO 27001 artifacts and IT requires SSO/SCIM without premium tier gating, SSO and core security features included at lower tiers (described differentiation vs Envoy), and One product/one contract approach contrasted with iLobby module stacking. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

51
MyLobby
69
Visitly
CriteriaMyLobbyVisitly
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. Visitly has the stronger published signal here.
69
MyLobby69/1004. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source16 reviews across review sources
87
Visitly87/1004. 4/5 from 212 published reviews across 5 sources, with 115 stored feedback themes212 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
MyLobby81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
Visitly81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.
31
MyLobby31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
31
Visitly31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals.
78
MyLobby78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
78
Visitly78/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
38
MyLobby38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
38
Visitly38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options.
NE
MyLobbyNo public score0 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
43
Visitly43/10010 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit. Visitly has the stronger published signal here.
37
MyLobby37/1004 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Visitly93/10012 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. Visitly has the stronger published signal here.
58
MyLobby58/10012 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured12 source pages analysed
75
Visitly75/10013 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured13 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.
93
MyLobby93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Visitly93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo access-control integration evidence capturedPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Visitly93/1003 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
MyLobbyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
NE
VisitlyNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. Visitly has the stronger published signal here.
68
MyLobby68/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Visitly93/1003 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose MyLobby when

  • Consider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion.
  • Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.
  • Contractor management

Choose Visitly when

  • Procurement requires SOC 2 / ISO 27001 artifacts and IT requires SSO/SCIM without premium tier gating
  • SSO and core security features included at lower tiers (described differentiation vs Envoy)
  • One product/one contract approach contrasted with iLobby module stacking
  • Buy when you need enterprise-grade identity integration (SSO/SCIM) and compliance evidence in one visitor-management product
  • Visitly publishes contractor management in contractor management.

MyLobby fit considerations

  • Map kiosk, tablet, badge, and QR-code workflows against the physical reception environment.
  • Check how the integration model fits identity, messaging, calendar, and access-control systems already in use.
  • Compare evacuation and occupancy workflows against site safety procedures and drill requirements.
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • How should evacuation lists, emergency response, and real-time occupancy workflows operate across your locations?

Visitly fit considerations

  • Limited reporting customization
  • Occasional iPad/app lag or disconnects
  • Slow or delayed support responses across time zones
  • Returning-visitor sign-in can be slow
  • Administrative/customization options less flexible than desired
MetricMyLobbyVisitly
Customer review sentiment4. 9/5 from 16 published reviews across 1 source4. 4/5 from 212 published reviews across 5 sources, with 115 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities8 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityiOS and Android; Optional kioskiOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Ongoing free accessFree trial publishedFree trial published
Deployment and integrations0 published deployment and integration options10 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage4 documented sectors12 documented sectors
Published evidence12 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured13 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured
Visitor management focus100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrationsNo access-control integration evidence captured3 access-control integration signals
Pricing transparencyPricing page published3 published pricing plans
Comparison positioningCompare when contractor management, evacuation support, kiosk and badge workflows are important selection criteria.Visitly positions itself as a security-first, single-contract visitor-management product that avoids multi-module stacking and tier-gating of enterprise controls.
Best-fit signalsConsider when contractor management is a shortlist criterion., Consider when evacuation support is a shortlist criterion., Consider when kiosk and badge workflows is a shortlist criterion., Consider when integration ecosystem is a shortlist criterion.Choose Visitly when procurement requires SOC 2 / ISO 27001 artifacts and IT requires SSO/SCIM without premium tier gating
Pricing informationPricing includes se Study Contact Us Support New Features MyLobby Visitor Management Pricing Packages Lite $45 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial QR...; een with the company logo Email Notification Ability to send notification via email Basic $85 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; compliance in the facility while also substantially speeding up your workflows. Standard $179 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Man...; lete the submission. This is a great way to ensure every entry is compliant. Professional $249 USD per location/month billed annually Free Trial Ma...Three published tiers (Starter, Business, Enterprise). Starter and Business show standard published price points and site limits; Enterprise is quoted with custom annual or multi-year contract. 14-day free trial available; monthly billing carries a premium on lower tiers. See pricing page for per-plan details.

MyLobby

www.mylobby.co/visitor-management-software-app

  • Contractor management
  • How should contractor induction, permit, document, and compliance workflows fit your site process?
  • low confidence
View full profile

Visitly

www.visitly.io

  • SSO and core security features included at lower tiers (described differentiation vs Envoy)
  • Which PACS/CCTV vendors you need supported and whether that support is included in your target tier
  • high confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system