Visitor management system comparison

ProVisit vs Splan

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

ProVisit has published signals around Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements, Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages, and Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting. Splan has published signals around Unified physical/digital identity governance across many sites and deep PACS/IAM integrations, You plan to use AI-driven analytics and natural-language operational controls, and Agentic AI assistant (PacsGPT™) for natural‑language queries and action orchestration across PACS and VMS —. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Choose ProVisit when

  • Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements
  • Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
  • Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting
  • Mid-to-large organisations needing contractor onboarding, multi-site visibility and compliance audit trails
  • ProVisit publishes sign-in control & approvals in security & compliance.

Choose Splan when

  • Unified physical/digital identity governance across many sites and deep PACS/IAM integrations.
  • You plan to use AI-driven analytics and natural-language operational controls.
  • Agentic AI assistant (PacsGPT™) for natural‑language queries and action orchestration across PACS and VMS —
  • Combined PIAM and Visitor Management for lifecycle-driven badge provisioning and deprovisioning —
  • Large enterprises requiring unified physical and digital identity governance

ProVisit fit considerations

  • No public pricing tiers — procurement requires a tailored quote
  • Hosting region and specific mobile platform support are not specified on public pages
  • Assess kiosk hardware options and integration with existing access control
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

Splan fit considerations

  • Assess kiosk/hardware compatibility and badge printer workflows
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
  • How should evacuation, roll-call, and on-site occupancy workflows operate across your sites?
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?
  • How well does Splan match your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?
MetricProVisitSplan
Recommended score90/10093/100
Hardware flexibilityOptional kioskOptional kiosk
Visitor workflow depth0 specialised workflow signals0 specialised workflow signals
Flexible, modular pricingCustom quoteCustom quote
Customer review sentimentNo review score listed4. 7/5 from 38 published reviews
Evidence confidencemediummedium
Published evidence19 vendor pages analysed14 vendor pages analysed
Best forBuyer seeking paperless visitor/contractor sign-in and audit trails, Organisations needing contractor onboarding and permit workflows, Multi-site operators wanting central visibility of who’s on site, Teams requiring fast contactless arrivals (QR codes) and badge printing, Organisations that want mobile evacuation/roll-call capabilityReception and front-desk automation, Enterprises requiring PIAM and unified badging, Data centers and secure facilities, Healthcare sites (hospitals), Multi-tenant property managers
Comparison positioningProVisit positions itself as a compliance-first UK visitor and contractor management platform with kiosk, QR and contractor onboarding features and tailored pricing.Splan positions itself as an integrated enterprise PIAM + Visitor Management platform with strong integration breadth and AI security tooling.
Best-fit signalsChoose ProVisit when contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirementsChoose Splan when you need unified physical/digital identity governance across many sites and deep PACS/IAM integrations., Choose Splan when you plan to use AI-driven analytics and natural-language operational controls.
Pricing informationWebsite states pricing is tailored to requirements and that ProVisit will prepare a no-obligation quote; no fixed public plans are shown (.Site lists a "Get Started for Free" prompt on the product page but does not publish standard pricing tiers; contact sales or demo for pricing details.

ProVisit

www.provisit.co.uk

  • Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
  • medium confidence
View full profile

Splan

www.splan.com

  • Agentic AI assistant (PacsGPT™) for natural‑language queries and action orchestration across PACS and VMS —
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system