Visitor management system comparison

ProVisit vs Teamgo

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

ProVisit has published signals around Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements, Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages, and Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting. Teamgo has published signals around A multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff, Unlimited kiosks and users per account as stated on product pages, and Geofencing attendance for automatic check-in/out of mobile staff. Use the side-by-side metrics below to compare workflow depth, pricing posture, deployment fit, hardware needs, review evidence, and industry coverage.

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

54
ProVisit
80
Teamgo
CriteriaProVisitTeamgo
Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.
87
ProVisit87/1005. 0/5 from 327 published reviews across 1 source, with 12 stored feedback themes327 reviews across review sources
82
Teamgo82/1004. 4/5 from 83 published reviews across 4 sources, with 38 stored feedback themes83 reviews across review sources
Visitor, contractor, evacuation & reporting workflowsVisitor, contractor, evacuation, identity, and reporting workflows.
81
ProVisit81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
81
Teamgo81/1007 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.
31
ProVisit31/1008 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Teamgo93/10031 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals
Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.
34
ProVisit34/100No public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
90
Teamgo90/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals
Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.
NE
ProVisitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
38
Teamgo38/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.
3
ProVisit3/1002 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Teamgo93/10027 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals
Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit.
93
ProVisit93/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Teamgo93/10011 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals
Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.
79
ProVisit79/10019 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured19 source pages analysed
93
Teamgo93/10024 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured24 source pages analysed
Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management. Teamgo has the stronger published signal here.
73
ProVisit73/10080% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Teamgo93/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals
Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems.
26
ProVisit26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals
26
Teamgo26/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals
Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.
NE
ProVisitNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals
63
Teamgo63/100Regional hosting signal publishedPublished vendor and profile signals
Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is.
93
ProVisit93/1001 published pricing planPublished vendor and profile signals
93
Teamgo93/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Choose ProVisit when

  • Contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirements
  • Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
  • Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO 27001 infrastructure hosting
  • Mid-to-large organisations needing contractor onboarding, multi-site visibility and compliance audit trails
  • ProVisit publishes sign-in control & approvals in security & compliance.

Choose Teamgo when

  • A multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff.
  • Unlimited kiosks and users per account as stated on product pages
  • Geofencing attendance for automatic check-in/out of mobile staff
  • FaceID facial recognition option and offline kiosk sync
  • Organisations needing multi-location cloud VMS with kiosk and mobile check-in

ProVisit fit considerations

  • No public pricing tiers — procurement requires a tailored quote
  • Hosting region and specific mobile platform support are not specified on public pages
  • Assess kiosk hardware options and integration with existing access control
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
  • Which plan structure best matches your number of locations, visitor volume, and rollout timeline?

Teamgo fit considerations

  • Validate integration depth (SCIM/API) for Azure/AD and calendar systems
  • Test offline kiosk behavior and badge printer compatibility (Brother QL series)
  • How should evacuation, roll-call, and on-site occupancy workflows operate across your sites?
  • Which existing workplace, identity, messaging, or access systems should this connect with?
  • Which privacy, compliance, and record-retention requirements matter most for your organisation?
MetricProVisitTeamgo
Customer review sentiment5. 0/5 from 327 published reviews across 1 source, with 12 stored feedback themes4. 4/5 from 83 published reviews across 4 sources, with 38 stored feedback themes
Visitor workflow depth7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals7 visitor, contractor, evacuation, badge, host, delivery, identity, and reporting signals
Published feature breadth8 documented capabilities31 documented capabilities
Deployment and integrations2 published deployment and integration options27 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage13 documented sectors11 documented sectors
Published evidence19 vendor pages analysed, 1 review source captured24 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus80% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations1 access-control integration signal1 access-control integration signal
Pricing transparency1 published pricing plan4 published pricing plans
Best forBuyer seeking paperless visitor/contractor sign-in and audit trails, Organisations needing contractor onboarding and permit workflows, Multi-site operators wanting central visibility of who’s on site, Teams requiring fast contactless arrivals (QR codes) and badge printing, Organisations that want mobile evacuation/roll-call capabilityOrganisations replacing paper visitor books with digital check-in, Multi-location workplaces needing centralised visitor and employee records, Schools and care facilities managing visitors, staff, health screening and emergencies, Construction and logistics sites managing contractors and attendance, Organisations requiring custom visitor workflows, documents and compliance records, Reception-lite workplaces replacing paper sign-in, Organisations needing contactless/QR check-in, Sites requiring pre-registration and inductions, Multi-site enterprises wanting central dashboard, Teams needing geofenced staff attendance, Front-desk visitor sign-in and reception automation, Teams requiring contractor induction and document collection, Sites needing emergency evacuation roll-call and alerts, Distributed workplaces wanting geofencing attendance for mobile staff
Comparison positioningProVisit positions itself as a compliance-first UK visitor and contractor management platform with kiosk, QR and contractor onboarding features and tailored pricing.Teamgo positions itself as a cloud-first, kiosk- and mobile-centric visitor management system suitable for small sites to global enterprises with a focus on contactless workflows and geofencing attendance.
Best-fit signalsChoose ProVisit when contractor compliance, permit workflows and multi-site roll-call reporting are priority requirementsChoose Teamgo when you need a multi-kiosk, contactless visitor solution with mobile app support and geofencing for distributed staff.
Pricing informationWebsite states pricing is tailored to requirements and that ProVisit will prepare a no-obligation quote; no fixed public plans are shownPublicly listed monthly plan prices shown on homepage; enterprise and add-on pricing available via sales.

ProVisit

www.provisit.co.uk

  • Explicit contractor-focused features (RAMS, inductions, digital permit-to-work) called out on product pages
  • medium confidence
View full profile

Teamgo

www.teamgo.co

  • Unlimited kiosks and users per account as stated on product pages
  • medium confidence
View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system
Second system