Visitor management system comparison

Eptura vs Vizito

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Side-by-side buyer-fit comparison focused on differences between Vizito and Eptura Visitor (formerly Proxyclick) across deployment, hardware, visitor journey, contractor management, evacuation, access control, pricing posture, reviews, evidence confidence, and buyer-fit questions.

Last checked: 1 Sept 2026
Sources: 48
Evidence confidence: Medium

Pair analysis confidence: medium

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

Eptura

Vizito

CriteriaEpturaVizito

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources.

Eptura97/1004. 6/5 from 1001 published reviews across 5 sources, with 111 stored feedback themes1,001 reviews across review sources

Vizito98/1004. 7/5 from 364 published reviews across 5 sources, with 145 stored feedback themes364 reviews across review sources

Visitor and contractor workflowsVisitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflows.

Eptura83/1005 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizito83/1005 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Evacuation managementEvacuation, emergency, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, and who-is-on-site workflows. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

100

Eptura100/1003 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizito67/1002 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Advanced reportingReporting, analytics, dashboards, audit logs, exports, visitor history, and compliance reporting. Vizito has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura67/1002 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizito100/1003 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

100

Eptura100/10026 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizito76/10016 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals.

Eptura97/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizito97/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

EpturaNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizito45/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura90/10018 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizito60/10012 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit.

100

Eptura100/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizito100/10012 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory.

100

Eptura100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

100

Vizito100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.

100

Eptura100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizito100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura67/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizito33/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

EpturaNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizito100/100EuropePublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. Vizito has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura75/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizito100/1004 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Key differences

Factor	Eptura	Vizito	Buyer meaning
Deployment & hosting	Explicitly states EU hosting and data residency; ISO 27001 certification and GDPR/NIS2 readiness called out.	Positioned as cloud SaaS within the larger Eptura platform; platform hosting (Azure) is stated for some modules but Visitor-specific hosting regions/data residency are not published on the Visitor overview.	If your procurement requires EU-only data residency and a named certification, Vizito is an immediately demonstrable fit; Eptura may meet enterprise hosting/security requirements but requires clarification of Visitor-specific hosting and residency.
Pricing posture	Published per-location pricing tiers with a 14-day free trial and visible price points (Standard/Pro/Enterprise).	No public pricing; buyer must contact vendor for a demo and quote.	Vizito offers transparent budgeting for early procurement decisions and quick pilots; Eptura requires sales engagement and may introduce variable or higher TCO through enterprise packaging.
Positioning & platform integration	Positioned as a focused EU-first VMS emphasizing multi-site admin, privacy/compliance and straightforward SaaS deployment.	Positioned as part of a unified Eptura workplace platform with stronger emphasis on cross-app analytics and platform-wide integrations.	Choose Vizito when you need a standalone, compliance-centred VMS quickly; choose Eptura when you anticipate value from deep cross-functional integration with workplace, asset and analytics capabilities.
Identity & verification features	Supports SSO and directory sync integrations (Microsoft Entra ID, Google Workspace) and host notifications; no explicit facial-recognition identity verification.	Documents identity verification options including facial recognition and configurable watchlists and visitor pre-approval workflows.	If advanced identity verification (for example, facial recognition, watchlists) is a hard requirement, Eptura lists these capabilities; Vizito may suffice for SSO and directory-based workflows but does not surface facial-recognition describes.
Access control & integrations	Publishes integrations including Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Teams, Slack and a REST API; one access-control integration signal.	Emphasises integrations with access control, calendar, HR, printer and guest Wi‑Fi systems and platform-level integration points; more signals for access-control integrations present.	Eptura surfaces broader ACS integration signals for security teams that need direct ACS coupling; Vizito supports common identity and comms integrations and an API but buyers should map required ACS adapters to each vendor.
Evacuation & roll-call capabilities	States emergency alerts and real-time visibility of people on-site; evacuation/roll-call described at product overview level.	States digital roll calls and emergency communications; also positioned for security and facilities teams with evacuation workflows.	Both vendors evacuation/mustering support; Vizito explicitly calls EU compliance and real‑time visibility while Eptura frames mustering inside an enterprise security/workplace context—buyers should validate specific evacuation UIs, export formats and SMS
Contractor and high-volume visitor workflows	Lists contractor registration, safety agreements and workflows for construction/manufacturing; published guidance for multi-location contractor/admin features.	Positioned for high-volume environments and multi-location management with front-of-house and security capabilities; visitor pre-approval and access permissions emphasised.	Vizito documents contractor safety/agreement workflows and multi-site admin as buyer-facing features; Eptura targets high-volume enterprise contexts with pre-approval and permission controls—buyers with complex contractor compliance should map specific safety-
Hardware & deployment complexity	Cloud-based, self-serve deployment with support for iPadOS, Android and browser kiosks; positions quick setup (under 30 minutes) and optional kiosk hardware.	Cloud-based SaaS but described as enterprise rollout complexity; supports kiosks and mobile but deployment often through an enterprise implementation approach.	Vizito is likely faster to pilot/self-deploy on existing tablets; Eptura expects a more managed enterprise rollout—choose based on project timeline and internal implementation bandwidth.

Choose Eptura when

EU-hosted data residency and explicit ISO 27001 / GDPR/NIS2 readiness out of the box.
Transparent per-location pricing and a rapid self-serve pilot or proof-of-concept.
You prioritise a focused VMS that can be deployed quickly on existing tablets and kiosks.
Visitor workflows tied into an enterprise workplace platform and unified analytics across space, asset and visitor data.
Part of a unified platform that combines workplace, asset, space and visitor data for cross-functional analytics

Choose Vizito when

Tight integration of visitor data into a larger workplace/asset/real-estate analytics platform.
Built-in advanced identity-verification features (facial recognition, watchlists) and deeper access-control adapter signals.
You expect an enterprise rollout with vendor-led implementation, custom enterprise integrations and platform-level reporting.
Multiple entrances need to share one location subscription.
Contactless smartphone registration is important.

Eptura fit considerations

Pricing perceived as high or difficult to justify; add-on costs
Custom badge configuration and badge image problems
Support-ticket migration and administrative delays with support
Performance issues such as slow loading or connectivity problems
Clunky login process for some users

Vizito fit considerations

Sites exceeding 300 monthly visits per location should evaluate the Enterprise threshold or other published buying options:
Organizations requiring Entra ID, Google Workspace synchronization or SAML SSO need the Enterprise plan in the published comparison:
Plan selection is tied to monthly registrations per location, so high-volume sites move beyond the Standard and Pro thresholds
Directory synchronization and SAML SSO are reserved for Enterprise in the published comparison
Badge printing requires a label printer in addition to the supported tablet or computer setup

What appears similar

Both vendors support cloud SaaS deployment, iOS/Android and browser-based kiosk workflows and QR/touchless check-ins.
Both vendors emergency/evacuation/mustering capabilities and multi-location administration.
Both vendors provide integrations with calendars, communication tools (Teams/Slack), SSO and have APIs/webhooks for custom integration.

Fit questions

Which system better matches your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?
Which platform fits your current workplace, identity, messaging, and access-control stack?
Which rollout path is easiest for your locations, support model, and budget?

Metric	Eptura	Vizito
Customer review sentiment	4. 6/5 from 1001 published reviews across 5 sources, with 111 stored feedback themes	4. 7/5 from 364 published reviews across 5 sources, with 145 stored feedback themes
Visitor and contractor workflows	5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals	5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals
Evacuation management	3 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals	2 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals
Advanced reporting	2 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals	3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals
Published feature breadth	26 documented capabilities	16 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibility	iOS and Android; Optional kiosk	iOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Deployment and integrations	18 published deployment and integration options	12 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	13 documented sectors	12 documented sectors
Published evidence	24 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured	24 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	2 access-control integration signals	1 access-control integration signal
Pricing transparency	Pricing page published	4 published pricing plans
Best for	Organizations managing visitors across multiple workplace locations, Security teams requiring visitor screening, access permissions, and watchlists, Front-of-house teams replacing manual sign-in with digital check-in, Facilities teams standardizing visitor processes across sites, High-volume visitor environments such as events centres, Front-desk and reception teams, Workplace and facilities managers, Enterprise IT/ security teams	Organizations replacing paper visitor logbooks with digital check-in, Small and medium-sized workplaces with limited reception staff, Multi-location organizations requiring centralized visitor administration, Sites using tablet, kiosk or QR-based contactless registration, Organizations requiring configurable agreements, consent and visitor fields, Facilities needing visitor screening and emergency visibility, Teams requiring visitor-log exports and audit trails, Organizations operating across European locations
Comparison positioning	Eptura Visitor is positioned as an enterprise-grade visitor management capability tightly integrated into a larger Eptura workplace and asset platform.	Vizito differentiates through per-location pricing with unlimited kiosks and QR codes, a contactless visitor workflow, European hosting and published GDPR-oriented controls.
Best-fit signals	Choose Eptura Visitor when you need visitor workflows tied into an enterprise workplace platform and unified analytics across space, asset and visitor data.	Choose this product when multiple entrances need to share one location subscription., Choose this product when contactless smartphone registration is important., Choose this product when European data hosting and GDPR workflows are procurement priorities., Choose this product when multi-location administration and grouped reporting are required.

SourcesVisitor product overview Eptura AI Eptura Platform Eptura Asset hosting

SourcesCore workflow Pricing GDPR controls NIS2 workflow

Eptura

eptura.com/proxyclick

Part of a unified platform that combines workplace, asset, space and visitor data for cross-functional analytics
Level of integration required with workplace booking, asset management and real-estate planning
medium confidence

View full profile

Vizito

vizito.eu

Per-location pricing rather than per-device pricing:
Compare visitor-volume thresholds by location.
high confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system