Visitor management system comparison

Eptura vs Vizitor

A side-by-side view of workflow fit, rollout signals, pricing posture, review evidence, and published product data.

Comparison summary

What is different?

Side-by-side comparison highlighting pair-specific differences between Eptura Visitor (formerly Proxyclick) and Vizitor for visitor management buyer fit, deployment, hardware, visitor journey, contractor management, evacuation, access control, pricing posture, reviews, evidence confidence, and suggested fit questions.

Last checked: 1 Sept 2026
Sources: 37
Evidence confidence: Medium

Pair analysis confidence: medium

Criteria scores

Scorecard by published evidence

Scores are calculated consistently from published vendor information, product evidence and review sources.

Eptura

Vizitor

CriteriaEpturaVizitor

Customer review sentimentReview rating and volume, normalised across sources. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura97/1004. 6/5 from 1001 published reviews across 5 sources, with 111 stored feedback themes1,001 reviews across review sources

Vizitor87/1004. 6/5 from 26 published reviews across 4 sources, with 127 stored feedback themes26 reviews across review sources

Visitor and contractor workflowsVisitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflows. Vizitor has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura83/1005 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizitor100/1006 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Evacuation managementEvacuation, emergency, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, and who-is-on-site workflows.

100

Eptura100/1003 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizitor100/1003 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Advanced reportingReporting, analytics, dashboards, audit logs, exports, visitor history, and compliance reporting. Vizitor has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura67/1002 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizitor100/1003 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Published feature breadthDocumented product capabilities found in public materials.

100

Eptura100/10026 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizitor100/10024 documented capabilitiesPublished vendor and profile signals

Mobile and kiosk flexibilityPublished iOS, Android, cloud, QR, kiosk, and flexible hardware signals.

Eptura97/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizitor97/100iOS and Android; Optional kioskPublished vendor and profile signals

Ongoing free accessPublished ongoing free access or trial availability.

EpturaNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizitor45/100Free trial publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

Deployment and integrationsPublished rollout, integration, and deployment options. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura90/10018 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizitor30/1006 published deployment and integration optionsPublished vendor and profile signals

Industry coverageBreadth of documented sector fit.

100

Eptura100/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizitor100/10013 documented sectorsPublished vendor and profile signals

Source coverageDepth of public source material captured by the directory. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

100

Eptura100/10024 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured24 source pages analysed

Vizitor88/10013 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured13 source pages analysed

Visitor management focusHow specifically the product is positioned around visitor management.

100

Eptura100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizitor100/100100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Access-control integrationsVisible integrations with physical access-control systems. Eptura has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura67/1002 access-control integration signalsPublished vendor and profile signals

Vizitor33/1001 access-control integration signalPublished vendor and profile signals

Regional hosting and data residencyVisible hosting or data-residency regions.

EpturaNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

VizitorNo public scoreNo public evidence captured yetPublished vendor and profile signals

Pricing transparencyHow visible and specific the public pricing information is. Vizitor has the stronger published signal here.

Eptura75/100Pricing page publishedPublished vendor and profile signals

100

Vizitor100/1003 published pricing plansPublished vendor and profile signals

This is a directory scoring model based on public vendor pages, review data, and visible product signals. It is designed to make differences easier to scan, not to declare a universal winner.

Key differences

Factor	Eptura	Vizitor	Buyer meaning
Buyer fit / positioning	Positioned as an enterprise-grade module within a broader workplace and asset platform; targeted at organizations needing unified analytics across workplace, asset and visitor data.	Positioned as a workplace and visitor platform emphasizing contractor management, evacuation, kiosk and badge workflows; positioned for teams prioritizing operational modules for visitors, mailroom, space and attendance.	Choose Eptura when you need tight alignment with workplace planning, asset data and enterprise platform-level analytics. Choose Vizitor when contractor workflows, evacuation lists, and modular workplace operations (mailroom, attendance) are primary selection d
Deployment complexity & hosting	Described as cloud-based SaaS with references to Microsoft Azure hosting for parts of the Eptura platform; deployment posture flagged as enterprise-rollout and higher implementation complexity.	Described as cloud-based with a guided-setup posture; deployment complexity signalled as guided setup and likely lower-friction onboarding.	If you require enterprise rollout processes, change management and integration into a large platform, Eptura aligns better. If you prefer a faster guided setup and lower initial deployment friction, Vizitor may fit better.
Hardware / kiosk and badge workflows	Kiosk support listed as optional; vendor materials indicate kiosk and mobile support (iOS, Android) but do not detail badge-printer or kiosk hardware programs in the Visitor overview.	Explicit product copy references kiosk and badge workflows and visitor check-in on tablets; hardware and badge workflows are a stated focus in vendor materials.	If badge printing and packaged kiosk/badge workflows matter, Vizitor’s materials call these out more directly. For organizations requiring kiosk flexibility within a larger integrated platform, Eptura supports optional kiosks but requires clarification on badg
Visitor journey & identity verification	Supports pre-registration, digital kiosk and mobile check-in, QR codes, touchless flows, host notifications and identity verification including facial recognition (platform AI references).	Covers visitor check-in, mobile workflows, badges and screening references in product pages; identity verification/integration ecosystem is referenced but with weaker captured evidence.	Eptura presents stronger documented identity/AI integration signals (including facial recognition references at platform level). Vizitor lists screening and check-in workflows but presents less explicit evidence for advanced identity/AI features in the capture
Contractor management	Contractor-specific capabilities are not called out explicitly in the Visitor overview material provided.	Contractor management is an explicit differentiation in Vizitor’s materials (contractor tracking, on-site compliance pages referenced).	If contractor induction, permiting and contractor compliance are high priority, Vizitor’s materials more directly address those workflows.
Evacuation and emergency headcounts	Eptura mentions digital roll calls and emergency communications to account for people during incidents as part of Visitor features.	Vizitor product text references evacuation support, emergency lists and attendance/emergency headcount workflows.	Both vendors reference evacuation/accounting workflows; Vizitor calls evacuation support out strongly in product copy surrounding attendance and emergency lists, while Eptura includes roll-call and emergency communications as part of its Visitor feature set.
Access control integrations	Integrations with access control are documented as part of Eptura’s overview and platform integrations (calendar, chat, SSO, access control mentions).	No access-control integration evidence was captured in the Vizitor comparison signals.	If you require vendor-proven access-control integrations, Eptura has clearer documented integration signals in the collected materials; verify Vizitor integration matrix if access-control connectivity is required.
Analytics & reporting	Positioned to feed visitor data into unified workplace analytics across space, asset and visitor datasets; reporting and analytics ties to Eptura platform are emphasized.	Vendor materials reference reporting, audit trails and occupancy/attendance metrics; evidence is present but less tied to a larger unified analytics platform.	Choose Eptura when you need visitor data integrated into enterprise workplace analytics. Vizitor provides reporting and audit trails but appears more focused on operational reports rather than cross-product analytics.

Choose Eptura when

Visitor workflows tightly integrated into an enterprise workplace and asset platform with unified analytics.
Access-control integrations and enterprise-grade platform controls are required.
You prefer vendor materials that document AI/identity verification capabilities at the platform level.
Visitor workflows tied into an enterprise workplace platform and unified analytics across space, asset and visitor data.
Part of a unified platform that combines workplace, asset, space and visitor data for cross-functional analytics

Choose Vizitor when

Contractor management, induction and compliance workflows are a primary selection criterion.
Explicit kiosk and badge workflow support called out in vendor materials.
You prefer to start evaluations with a free trial or guided-setup onboarding model and want more immediately visible pricing signals.
A single platform to manage visitors, contractors and hybrid workplace operations across multiple sites quickly.
ISO 27001 certification, AES-256 encryption and VAPT testing are required baseline credentials.

Eptura fit considerations

Pricing perceived as high or difficult to justify; add-on costs
Custom badge configuration and badge image problems
Support-ticket migration and administrative delays with support
Performance issues such as slow loading or connectivity problems
Clunky login process for some users

Vizitor fit considerations

If you require an exhaustive connector list or custom API details for deep HR/AD integrations, the product pages list common integrations but do not publish a full connector catalogue.
Initial setup and device configuration can take time
Tablet display / landscape-mode rendering limitations
Occasional glitches or server errors
Some requested features perceived as underdeveloped or slow to be addressed

What appears similar

Both platforms support mobile (iOS/Android) and optional kiosk-based check-in workflows.
Both platforms reference evacuation/emergency headcount capabilities and visitor check-in, host notifications and badges in their product messaging.
Both vendors position as workplace/enterprise-capable visitor systems, but differ on integration depth vs modular operational features.

Fit questions

Which system better matches your busiest visitor, contractor, or reception workflow?
Which platform fits your current workplace, identity, messaging, and access-control stack?
Which rollout path is easiest for your locations, support model, and budget?

Metric	Eptura	Vizitor
Customer review sentiment	4. 6/5 from 1001 published reviews across 5 sources, with 111 stored feedback themes	4. 6/5 from 26 published reviews across 4 sources, with 127 stored feedback themes
Visitor and contractor workflows	5 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals	6 visitor, contractor, badge, host, delivery, identity, and QR workflow signals
Evacuation management	3 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals	3 evacuation, mustering, roll-call, occupancy, or emergency signals
Advanced reporting	2 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals	3 reporting, analytics, audit, export, or visitor-history signals
Published feature breadth	26 documented capabilities	24 documented capabilities
Mobile and kiosk flexibility	iOS and Android; Optional kiosk	iOS and Android; Optional kiosk
Deployment and integrations	18 published deployment and integration options	6 published deployment and integration options
Industry coverage	13 documented sectors	13 documented sectors
Published evidence	24 vendor pages analysed, 5 review sources captured	13 vendor pages analysed, 4 review sources captured
Visitor management focus	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals	100% fit against visitor-management-specific positioning signals
Access-control integrations	2 access-control integration signals	1 access-control integration signal
Pricing transparency	Pricing page published	3 published pricing plans
Best for	Organizations managing visitors across multiple workplace locations, Security teams requiring visitor screening, access permissions, and watchlists, Front-of-house teams replacing manual sign-in with digital check-in, Facilities teams standardizing visitor processes across sites, High-volume visitor environments such as events centres, Front-desk and reception teams, Workplace and facilities managers, Enterprise IT/ security teams	Reception automation & faster visitor throughput, Multi-site operations needing unified admin and reporting, Facilities teams needing integrated contractor compliance, HR/People teams managing candidate and attendance flows, Security teams needing watchlist screening and audit trails, Healthcare sites requiring health‑screening and ward rules, Co-working operators offering branded multi-tenant check-in, Schools needing custody/watchlist screening and emergency rosters
Comparison positioning	Eptura Visitor is positioned as an enterprise-grade visitor management capability tightly integrated into a larger Eptura workplace and asset platform.	Vizitor is positioned as a workplace-first WMS that grew from a visitor management core, emphasising fast, self-serve deployments, integrated contractor compliance and enterprise-grade security.
Best-fit signals	Choose Eptura Visitor when you need visitor workflows tied into an enterprise workplace platform and unified analytics across space, asset and visitor data.	Choose Vizitor when you need a single platform to manage visitors, contractors and hybrid workplace operations across multiple sites quickly., Choose Vizitor when ISO 27001 certification, AES-256 encryption and VAPT testing are required baseline credentials., Choose Vizitor when you want tablet-based kiosk and QR touchless flows on existing hardware rather than new proprietary kiosks.

SourcesVisitor product overview Eptura AI Eptura Platform Eptura Asset hosting

SourcesVisitor Management System Security & Compliance Overview Pricing

Eptura

eptura.com/proxyclick

Part of a unified platform that combines workplace, asset, space and visitor data for cross-functional analytics
Level of integration required with workplace booking, asset management and real-estate planning
medium confidence

View full profile

Vizitor

www.vizitorapp.com

Built-from-first principles VMS that expanded into an integrated WMS (visitor + contractors + attendance + spaces) rather than a bolt-on suite.
Compare per-location pricing and monthly check-in allowances to expected traffic and number of entry points.
high confidence

View full profile

How to use this comparison

Metrics are calculated consistently from public vendor information, review sources and product data. Data availability varies by vendor, so consider your own security, operational, regional and budget requirements before deciding which system fits.

Compare another pair

Change one system

Both current systems are selected. Choose a different system in either field to open a new comparison.

First system

Second system